Add targets to a conservation planning problem by log-linearly
interpolating the targets between thresholds based on the total amount of
each feature in the study area (Rodrigues et al. 2004). Additionally,
caps can be applied to targets to prevent features with massive
distributions from being over-represented
in solutions (Butchart et al. 2015). Note that the behavior
of this function has changed substantially from versions prior to 5.0.0.
add_loglinear_targets(x, lower_bound_amount, lower_bound_target,
upper_bound_amount, upper_bound_target, cap_amount = NULL,
cap_target = NULL, abundances = feature_abundances(x, na.rm =
FALSE)$absolute_abundance)ConservationProblem-class object.
numeric threshold.
numeric relative target that should be
applied to features with a total amount that is less
than or equal to lower_bound_amount.
numeric threshold.
numeric relative target that should be
applied to features with a total amount that is greater
than or equal to upper_bound_amount.
numeric total amount at which targets should be
capped. Defaults to NULL so that targets are not capped.
numeric amount-based target to apply to features
which have a total amount greater than argument to cap_amount.
Defaults to NULL so that targets are not capped.
numeric total amount of each feature to
use when calculating the targets. Defaults to the feature abundances in the #' study area (calculated using the feature_abundances function.
ConservationProblem-class object with the targets added
to it.
Targets are used to specify the minimum amount or proportion of a
feature's distribution that needs to be protected. All conservation
planning problems require adding targets with the exception of the maximum
cover problem (see add_max_cover_objective), which maximizes
all features in the solution and therefore does not require targets.
Seven parameters are used to calculate the targets:
lower_bound_amount specifies the first range size threshold,
lower_bound_target specifies the relative target required for
species with a range size equal to or less than the first threshold,
upper_bound_amount specifies the second range size threshold,
upper_bound_target specifies the relative target required for
species with a range size equal to or greater than the second threshold,
cap_amount specifies the third range size threshold,
cap_target specifies the absolute target that is uniformly applied
to species with a range size larger than that third threshold, and finally
abundances specifies the range size for each feature
that should be used when calculating the targets.
Note that the target calculations do not account for the
size of each planning unit. Therefore, the feature data should account for
the size of each planning unit if this is important (e.g. pixel values in
the argument to features in the function problem could
correspond to amount of land occupied by the feature in \(km^2\) units).
This function can only be applied to
ConservationProblem-class objects that are associated with a
single zone.
Rodrigues ASL, Akcakaya HR, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Chanson JS, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, and others (2004) Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. BioScience, 54: 1092--1100.
Butchart SHM, Clarke M, Smith RJ, Sykes RE, Scharlemann JPW, Harfoot M, Buchanan, GM, Angulo A, Balmford A, Bertzky B, and others (2015) Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conservation Letters, 8: 329--337.
# NOT RUN {
# load data
data(sim_pu_raster, sim_features)
# create problem using loglinear targets
p <- problem(sim_pu_raster, sim_features) %>%
add_min_set_objective() %>%
add_loglinear_targets(10, 0.9, 100, 0.2) %>%
add_binary_decisions()
# }
# NOT RUN {
# solve problem
s <- solve(p)
# plot solution
plot(s, main = "solution", axes = FALSE, box = FALSE)
# }
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab