simHub2(S = 100, j = 10, D = 1, cycles = 10000, m = 0.01,
anima = TRUE)
simHub3(Sm = 200, jm = 20, S = 100, j = 10, D = 1, cycles = 10000,
m = 0.01, nu = 0.001, anima = TRUE)
Arguments
S
number of species in the community.
j
individuals per species in the metacommunity.
D
number of deaths per cycle.
cycles
number of cycles in the simulation.
m.weights
Mortality weights for each species. Mortality rates of
individuals of each species is proportional to species' abundances
multiplied by these weights as in Yu et al. (1998). In neutral dynamics all
weigths are equal. If length(m.weights)<S then species are divided in
groups of (approximately) S/length(m.weights) and species of each group
have a value in m.weights. This allows to create groups of species with
different mortality probabilities and compare to the neutral dynamics.
anima
logical; if TRUE, the simulation frames of the metacommunity
are shown.
m
colonization/immigration rate.
Sm
number of species in the metacommunity.
jm
individuals per species in the metacommunity.
nu
speciation rate.
Value
These functions returns a graph with the number of species in time
(cycles) in the metacommunity.
They also return an invisible matrix with the results of species richness
on each community per time.
Details
'simHub1' is the model without immigration.
'simHub2' incorporates immigration rate from the metacommunity
'simHub3' incorporates immigration and speciation rates in the
metacommunity.
References
Hubbell, S.P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity
and Biogeography. Princeton University Pres, 448p.
Yu, D. W., Terborgh, J. W., and Potts, M. D. 1998. Can high tree species
richness be explained by Hubbell's null model?. Ecology Letters, 1(3):
193--199.
# NOT RUN {# }# NOT RUN {simHub1(S=10,j=10, D=1, cycles=5e3)
simHub2(j=2,cycles=2e4,m=0.1)
simHub3(Sm=200, jm=20, S= 10, j=100, D=1, cycles=1e4, m=0.01, nu=0.001, anima=TRUE)
# }# NOT RUN {# }