# Look at how the minimal detectable ratio of means for the one-sample t-test
# increases with increasing required power:
seq(0.5, 0.9, by = 0.1)
#[1] 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
ratio.of.means <- tTestLnormAltRatioOfMeans(n.or.n1 = 20,
power = seq(0.5, 0.9, by = 0.1))
round(ratio.of.means, 2)
#[1] 1.47 1.54 1.63 1.73 1.89
#----------
# Repeat the last example, but compute the minimal detectable ratio of means
# based on the approximate power instead of the exact:
ratio.of.means <- tTestLnormAltRatioOfMeans(n.or.n1 = 20,
power = seq(0.5, 0.9, by = 0.1), approx = TRUE)
round(ratio.of.means, 2)
#[1] 1.48 1.55 1.63 1.73 1.89
#==========
# Look at how the minimal detectable ratio of means for the two-sample t-test
# decreases with increasing sample size:
seq(10, 50, by = 10)
#[1] 10 20 30 40 50
ratio.of.means <- tTestLnormAltRatioOfMeans(seq(10, 50, by = 10), sample.type="two")
round(ratio.of.means, 2)
#[1] 4.14 2.65 2.20 1.97 1.83
#----------
# Look at how the minimal detectable ratio of means for the two-sample t-test
# decreases with increasing values of Type I error:
ratio.of.means <- tTestLnormAltRatioOfMeans(n.or.n1 = 20,
alpha = c(0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1), sample.type = "two")
round(ratio.of.means, 2)
#[1] 4.06 3.20 2.65 2.42
#==========
# The guidance document Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document
# (USEPA, 1996c, Part 4) discusses sampling design and sample size calculations
# for studies to determine whether the soil at a potentially contaminated site
# needs to be investigated for possible remedial action. Let 'theta' denote the
# average concentration of the chemical of concern. The guidance document
# establishes the following goals for the decision rule (USEPA, 1996c, p.87):
#
# Pr[Decide Don't Investigate | theta > 2 * SSL] = 0.05
#
# Pr[Decide to Investigate | theta <= (SSL/2)] = 0.2
#
# where SSL denotes the pre-established soil screening level.
#
# These goals translate into a Type I error of 0.2 for the null hypothesis
#
# H0: [theta / (SSL/2)] <= 1
#
# and a power of 95% for the specific alternative hypothesis
#
# Ha: [theta / (SSL/2)] = 4
#
# Assuming a lognormal distribution, the above values for Type I and power, and a
# coefficient of variation of 2, determine the minimal detectable increase above
# the soil screening level associated with various sample sizes for the one-sample
# test. Based on these calculations, you need to take at least 6 soil samples to
# satisfy the requirements for the Type I and Type II errors when the coefficient
# of variation is 2.
N <- 2:8
ratio.of.means <- tTestLnormAltRatioOfMeans(n.or.n1 = N, cv = 2, alpha = 0.2,
alternative = "greater")
names(ratio.of.means) <- paste("N=", N, sep = "")
round(ratio.of.means, 1)
# N=2 N=3 N=4 N=5 N=6 N=7 N=8
#19.9 7.7 5.4 4.4 3.8 3.4 3.1
#----------
# Repeat the last example, but use the approximate power calculation instead of
# the exact. Using the approximate power calculation, you need 7 soil samples
# when the coefficient of variation is 2. Note how poorly the approximation
# works in this case for small sample sizes!
ratio.of.means <- tTestLnormAltRatioOfMeans(n.or.n1 = N, cv = 2, alpha = 0.2,
alternative = "greater", approx = TRUE)
names(ratio.of.means) <- paste("N=", N, sep = "")
round(ratio.of.means, 1)
# N=2 N=3 N=4 N=5 N=6 N=7 N=8
#990.8 18.5 8.3 5.7 4.6 3.9 3.5
#==========
# Clean up
#---------
rm(ratio.of.means, N)
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab