The zero argument allows users to conveniently
model certain linear/additive predictors as intercepts
only.
Arguments
Value
Nothing is returned.
It is simply a convenient argument for constraining
certain linear/additive predictors to be an intercept only.
Warning
The use of other arguments may conflict with the zero
argument. For example, using constraints to input constraint
matrices may conflict with the zero argument.
Another example is the argument parallel.
In general users
should not assume any particular order of precedence when
there is potential conflict of definition.
Currently no checking for consistency is made.
The argument zero may be renamed in the future to
something better.
Side Effects
The argument creates the appropriate constraint matrices
internally.
Details
Often a certain parameter needs to be modelled simply while other
parameters in the model may be more complex, for example, the
$\lambda$ parameter in LMS-Box-Cox quantile regression
should be modelled more simply compared to its $\mu$ parameter.
Another example is the $\xi$ parameter in a GEV distribution
which is should be modelled simpler than its $\mu$ parameter.
Using the zero argument allows this to be fitted conveniently
without having to input all the constraint matrices explicitly.
The zero argument should be assigned an integer vector from the
set {1:M} where M is the number of linear/additive
predictors. Full details about constraint matrices can be found in
the references.
References
Yee, T. W. and Wild, C. J. (1996)
Vector generalized additive models.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological,
58, 481--493.
Yee, T. W. and Hastie, T. J. (2003)
Reduced-rank vector generalized linear models.
Statistical Modelling,
3, 15--41.