This data set illustrates the relationship between body measurements and body fat in 252 males aged between 21 and 81 years.
data(fat)
A data frame with 252 rows and 26 variables.
Obs
observation number.
Perc.body.fat.Brozek
percent body fat using Brozek's equation, i.e., \(457/Density - 414.2\).
Perc.body.fat.Siri
percent body fat using Siri's equation, i.e., \(495/Density - 450\).
Density
density (\(\frac{g}{cm^3}\)).
Age
age (years).
Weight
weight (lbs).
Height
height (inches).
Adiposity.index
adiposity index computed as \(Weight/Height^2\) (\(\frac{kg}{m^2}\)).
Fat.free.weight
fat free weight computed as \((1 - Brozek's percent body fat) * Weight\) (lbs).
Neck.circ
neck circumference (cm).
Chest.circ
chest circumference (cm).
Abdomen.circ
abdomen circumference (cm) measured at the umbilicus and level with the iliac crest.
Hip.circ
hip circumference (cm).
Thigh.circ
thigh circumference (cm).
Knee.circ
knee circumference (cm).
Ankle.circ
ankle circumference (cm).
Biceps.circ
extended biceps circumference (cm).
Forearm.circ
forearm circumference (cm).
Wrist.circ
wrist circumference (cm).
inv.Density
inverse of density (\(\frac{cm^3}{g}\)).
z1
log of weight divided by log of height (allometric measure).
z2
abdomen circumference divided by chest circumference (beer gut factor).
z3
index based on knee, wrist, and ankle circumference relative to height (\(\frac{(Knee.circ * Wrist.circ * Ankle.circ)^(1/3)}{Height}\)).
z4
fleshiness index based on biceps, thigh, forearm, knee, wrist, and ankle circumference (\(\frac{Biceps.circ * Thigh.circ * Forearm.circ}{Knee.circ * Wrist.circ * Ankle.circ}\)).
z5
age standardized to zero mean and unit variance.
z6
square of standardized age.
Burnham and Anderson (2002, p. 268) use this data set to show model selection uncertainty in the context of all possible combinations of explanatory variables. The data are originally from Penrose et al. (1985) who used only the first 143 cases of the 252 observations in the data set. Johnson (1996) later used these data as an example of multiple regression. Note that observation number 42 originally had an erroneous height of 29.5 inches and that this value was changed to 69.5 inches.
Burnham and Anderson (2002, p. 274) created six indices based on the
original measurements (i.e., z1 -- z6). Although Burnham and Anderson
(2002) indicate that the fleshiness index (z4
) involved the cubic
root in the equation, the result table for the full model on p. 276
suggests that the index did not include the cubic root for z4
.
The latter is the version of z4
used in the data set here.