An MP that makes incremental adjustments to TAC recommendations based on the apparent trend in CPUE, a an MP that makes incremental adjustments to TAC recommendations based on index levels relative to target levels (BMSY/B0) and catch levels relative to target levels (MSY).
SBT1(x, Data, reps = 100, plot = FALSE, yrsmth = 10, k1 = 1.5, k2 = 3,
gamma = 1)SBT2(x, Data, reps = 100, plot = FALSE, epsR = 0.75, tauR = 5,
gamma = 1)
A position in a data-limited methods data object
A data-limited methods data object
The number of stochastic samples of the MP recommendation(s)
Logical. Show the plot?
The number of years for evaluating trend in relative abundance indices
Control parameter
Control parameter
Control parameter
Control parameter
Control parameter
An object of class Rec
with the TAC
slot populated with a numeric vector of length reps
SBT1
: Simple SBT MP
SBT2
: Complex SBT MP
See '>Data for information on the Data
object
SBT1
: Cat, Ind, Year
SBT2
: Cat, Cref, Rec
See Online Documentation for correctly rendered equations
For SBT1
the TAC is calculated as:
$$\textrm{TAC}_y =
\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
C_{y-1} (1+K_2\lambda) & \textrm{if } \lambda \geq 0 \\
C_{y-1} (1-K_1\lambda^\gamma) & \textrm{if } \lambda < 0\\
\end{array}\right.
$$
where \(\lambda\) is the slope of index over the last yrmsth
years, and
\(K_1\), \(K_2\), and \(\gamma\) are arguments to the MP.
For SBT2
the TAC is calculated as:
$$\textrm{TAC}_y = 0.5 (C_{y-1} + C_\textrm{targ}\delta)$$
where \(C_{y-1}\) is catch in the previous year, \(C_{\textrm{targ}}\)
is a target catch (Data@Cref
), and :
$$\delta=
\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
R^{1-\textrm{epsR}} & \textrm{if } R \geq 1 \\
R^{1+\textrm{epsR}} & \textrm{if } R < 1 \\
\end{array}\right.
$$
where \(\textrm{epsR}\) is a control parameter and:
\(R = \frac{\bar{r}}{\phi}\)
where \(\bar{r}\) is mean recruitment over last tauR
years and \(\phi\)
is mean recruitment over last 10 years.
This isn't exactly the same as the proposed methods and is stochastic in this implementation. The method doesn't tend to work too well under many circumstances possibly due to the lack of 'tuning' that occurs in the real SBT assessment environment. You could try asking Rich Hillary at CSIRO about this approach.
http://www.ccsbt.org/site/recent_assessment.php
# NOT RUN {
SBT1(1, Data=DLMtool::SimulatedData, plot=TRUE)
SBT2(1, Data=DLMtool::SimulatedData, plot=TRUE)
# }
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab