ci.pd: Compute confidence limits for a difference of two independent proportions.
Description
The usual formula for the c.i. of at difference of proportions is
inaccurate. Newcombe has compared 11 methods and method 10 in his
paper looks like a winner. It is implemented here.
Numeric vector of successes in sample 1. Can also be a
matrix or array (see details).
bb
Successes in sample 2.
cc
Failures in sample 1.
dd
Failures in sample 2.
method
Method to use for calculation of confidence interval, see
"Details".
alpha
Significance level
conf.level
Confidence level
print
Should an account of the two by two table be printed.
digits
How many digits should the result be rounded to if printed.
detail.labs
Should the computing of probability differences be
reported in the labels.
Value
A matrix with three columns: probability difference, lower and upper
limit. The number of rows equals the length of the vectors aa,
bb, cc and dd or, if aa is a 3-way matrix,
dim(aa)[3].
Details
Implements method 10 from Newcombe(1998) (method="Nc") or from
Agresti & Caffo(2000) (method="AC").
aa, bb, cc and dd can be vectors.
If aa is a matrix, the elements [1:2,1:2] are used, with
successes aa[,1:2]. If aa is a three-way table or array,
the elements aa[1:2,1:2,] are used.
References
RG Newcombe: Interval estimation for the difference between
independent proportions. Comparison of eleven methods. Statistics in
Medicine, 17, pp. 873-890, 1998.
A Agresti & B Caffo: Simple and effective confidence intervals for
proportions and differences of proportions result from adding two
successes and two failures. The American Statistician,
54(4), pp. 280-288, 2000.