d.jobsecurity

This dataset is from Emmenegger (2011), who analyzes the determinants of 
high job security regulations in Western democracies using fsQCA.

datasets

Provides comprehensive functionalities for causal modeling with Coincidence Analysis (CNA), which is a configurational comparative method of causal data analysis that was first introduced in Baumgartner (2009) <doi:10.1177/0049124109339369>, and generalized in Baumgartner & Ambuehl (2018) <doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.45>. CNA is related to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), but contrary to the latter, it is custom-built for uncovering causal structures with multiple outcomes and it builds causal models from the bottom up by gradually combining single factors to complex dependency structures until the requested thresholds of model fit are met. The new functionalities provided by this package version include functions for evaluating and benchmarking the correctness of CNA's output, a function determining whether a solution is an INUS model, a function bringing non-INUS expressions into INUS form, and a function for identifying cyclic models. The package vignette has been updated accordingly.

Mathias Ambuehl

Causal Modeling with Coincidence Analysis

Michael Baumgartner

Ruedi Epple

Veli-Pekka Parkkinen

Alrik Thiem

d.jobsecurity function

The data frame contains 19 rows (cases) and the following 7 columns featuring fuzzy-set factors:<table><tr><td>
[ , 1] </td>
<td> S </td>
<td> statism </td>
<td> ("1" high, "0" not high)</td>
<td>
[ , 2] </td>
<td> C </td>
</tr><tr><td> non-market coordination </td>
<td> ("1" high, "0" not high)</td>
<td>
[ , 3] </td>
<td> L </td>
<td> labour movement strength </td>
<td> ("1" high, "0" not high)</td>
</tr><tr><td>
[ , 4] </td>
<td> R </td>
<td> Catholicism </td>
<td> ("1" high, "0" not high)</td>
<td>
[ , 5] </td>
<td> P </td>
</tr><tr><td> religious party strength </td>
<td> ("1" high, "0" not high)</td>
<td>
[ , 6] </td>
<td> V </td>
<td> institutional veto points </td>
<td> ("1" many, "0" not many)</td>
</tr></table>

d.jobsecurity: Job security regulations in western democracies

Description

Usage

Arguments

Format

Contributors

[ , 1]	S	statism	("1" high, "0" not high)	[ , 2]	C
non-market coordination	("1" high, "0" not high)	[ , 3]	L	labour movement strength	("1" high, "0" not high)
[ , 4]	R	Catholicism	("1" high, "0" not high)	[ , 5]	P
religious party strength	("1" high, "0" not high)	[ , 6]	V	institutional veto points	("1" many, "0" not many)