Learn R Programming

coin (version 1.3-0)

ContingencyTests: Tests of Independence in Two- or Three-Way Contingency Tables

Description

Testing the independence of two nominal or ordered factors.

Usage

# S3 method for formula
chisq_test(formula, data, subset = NULL, weights = NULL, …)
# S3 method for table
chisq_test(object, …)
# S3 method for IndependenceProblem
chisq_test(object, …)

# S3 method for formula cmh_test(formula, data, subset = NULL, weights = NULL, …) # S3 method for table cmh_test(object, …) # S3 method for IndependenceProblem cmh_test(object, …)

# S3 method for formula lbl_test(formula, data, subset = NULL, weights = NULL, …) # S3 method for table lbl_test(object, …) # S3 method for IndependenceProblem lbl_test(object, …)

Arguments

formula

a formula of the form y ~ x | block where y and x are factors and block is an optional factor for stratification.

data

an optional data frame containing the variables in the model formula.

subset

an optional vector specifying a subset of observations to be used. Defaults to NULL.

weights

an optional formula of the form ~ w defining integer valued case weights for each observation. Defaults to NULL, implying equal weight for all observations.

object

an object inheriting from classes "table" or "'>IndependenceProblem".

further arguments to be passed to independence_test.

Value

An object inheriting from class "'>IndependenceTest".

Details

chisq_test, cmh_test and lbl_test provide the Pearson chi-squared test, the generalized Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and the linear-by-linear association test. A general description of these methods is given by Agresti (2002).

The null hypothesis of independence, or conditional independence given block, between y and x is tested.

If y and/or x are ordered factors, the default scores, 1:nlevels(y) and 1:nlevels(x) respectively, can be altered using the scores argument (see independence_test); this argument can also be used to coerce nominal factors to class "ordered". (lbl_test coerces to class "ordered" under any circumstances.) If both y and x are ordered factors, a linear-by-linear association test is computed and the direction of the alternative hypothesis can be specified using the alternative argument. For the Pearson chi-squared test, this extension was given by Yates (1948) who also discussed the situation when either the response or the covariate is an ordered factor; see also Cochran (1954) and Armitage (1955) for the particular case when y is a binary factor and x is ordered. The Mantel-Haenszel statistic (Mantel and Haenszel, 1959) was similarly extended by Mantel (1963) and Landis, Heyman and Koch (1978).

The conditional null distribution of the test statistic is used to obtain \(p\)-values and an asymptotic approximation of the exact distribution is used by default (distribution = "asymptotic"). Alternatively, the distribution can be approximated via Monte Carlo resampling or computed exactly for univariate two-sample problems by setting distribution to "approximate" or "exact" respectively. See asymptotic, approximate and exact for details.

References

Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis, Second Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Armitage, P. (1955). Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 11(3), 375--386. 10.2307/3001775

Cochran, W.G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common \(\chi^2\) tests. Biometrics 10(4), 417--451. 10.2307/3001616

Davis, L. J. (1986). Exact tests for \(2 \times 2\) contingency tables. The American Statistician 40(2), 139--141. 10.1080/00031305.1986.10475377

Landis, J. R., Heyman, E. R. and Koch, G. G. (1978). Average partial association in three-way contingency tables: a review and discussion of alternative tests. International Statistical Review 46(3), 237--254. 10.2307/1402373

Mantel, N. and Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22(4), 719--748. 10.1093/jnci/22.4.719

Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(303), 690--700. 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500879

Yates, F. (1948). The analysis of contingency tables with groupings based on quantitative characters. Biometrika 35(1/2), 176--181. 10.1093/biomet/35.1-2.176

Examples

Run this code
# NOT RUN {
## Example data
## Davis (1986, p. 140)
davis <- matrix(
    c(3,  6,
      2, 19),
    nrow = 2, byrow = TRUE
)
davis <- as.table(davis)

## Asymptotic Pearson chi-squared test
chisq_test(davis)
chisq.test(davis, correct = FALSE) # same as above

## Approximative (Monte Carlo) Pearson chi-squared test
ct <- chisq_test(davis,
                 distribution = approximate(nresample = 10000))
pvalue(ct)             # standard p-value
midpvalue(ct)          # mid-p-value
pvalue_interval(ct)    # p-value interval
size(ct, alpha = 0.05) # test size at alpha = 0.05 using the p-value

## Exact Pearson chi-squared test (Davis, 1986)
## Note: disagrees with Fisher's exact test
ct <- chisq_test(davis,
                 distribution = "exact")
pvalue(ct)             # standard p-value
midpvalue(ct)          # mid-p-value
pvalue_interval(ct)    # p-value interval
size(ct, alpha = 0.05) # test size at alpha = 0.05 using the p-value
fisher.test(davis)


## Laryngeal cancer data
## Agresti (2002, p. 107, Tab. 3.13)
cancer <- matrix(
    c(21, 2,
      15, 3),
    nrow = 2, byrow = TRUE,
    dimnames = list(
        "Treatment" = c("Surgery", "Radiation"),
           "Cancer" = c("Controlled", "Not Controlled")
    )
)
cancer <- as.table(cancer)

## Exact Pearson chi-squared test (Agresti, 2002, p. 108, Tab. 3.14)
## Note: agrees with Fishers's exact test
(ct <- chisq_test(cancer,
                  distribution = "exact"))
midpvalue(ct)          # mid-p-value
pvalue_interval(ct)    # p-value interval
size(ct, alpha = 0.05) # test size at alpha = 0.05 using the p-value
fisher.test(cancer)


## Homework conditions and teacher's rating
## Yates (1948, Tab. 1)
yates <- matrix(
    c(141, 67, 114, 79, 39,
      131, 66, 143, 72, 35,
       36, 14,  38, 28, 16),
    byrow = TRUE, ncol = 5,
    dimnames = list(
           "Rating" = c("A", "B", "C"),
        "Condition" = c("A", "B", "C", "D", "E")
    )
)
yates <- as.table(yates)

## Asymptotic Pearson chi-squared test (Yates, 1948, p. 176)
chisq_test(yates)

## Asymptotic Pearson-Yates chi-squared test (Yates, 1948, pp. 180-181)
## Note: 'Rating' and 'Condition' as ordinal
(ct <- chisq_test(yates,
                  alternative = "less",
                  scores = list("Rating" = c(-1, 0, 1),
                                "Condition" = c(2, 1, 0, -1, -2))))
statistic(ct)^2 # chi^2 = 2.332

## Asymptotic Pearson-Yates chi-squared test (Yates, 1948, p. 181)
## Note: 'Rating' as ordinal
chisq_test(yates,
           scores = list("Rating" = c(-1, 0, 1))) # Q = 3.825


## Change in clinical condition and degree of infiltration
## Cochran (1954, Tab. 6)
cochran <- matrix(
    c(11,  7,
      27, 15,
      42, 16,
      53, 13,
      11,  1),
    byrow = TRUE, ncol = 2,
    dimnames = list(
              "Change" = c("Marked", "Moderate", "Slight",
                           "Stationary", "Worse"),
        "Infiltration" = c("0-7", "8-15")
    )
)
cochran <- as.table(cochran)

## Asymptotic Pearson chi-squared test (Cochran, 1954, p. 435)
chisq_test(cochran) # X^2 = 6.88

## Asymptotic Cochran-Armitage test (Cochran, 1954, p. 436)
## Note: 'Change' as ordinal
(ct <- chisq_test(cochran,
                  scores = list("Change" = c(3, 2, 1, 0, -1))))
statistic(ct)^2 # X^2 = 6.66


## Change in size of ulcer crater for two treatment groups
## Armitage (1955, Tab. 2)
armitage <- matrix(
    c( 6, 4, 10, 12,
      11, 8,  8,  5),
    byrow = TRUE, ncol = 4,
    dimnames = list(
        "Treatment" = c("A", "B"),
           "Crater" = c("Larger", "< 2/3 healed",
                        ">= 2/3 healed", "Healed")
    )
)
armitage <- as.table(armitage)

## Approximative (Monte Carlo) Pearson chi-squared test (Armitage, 1955, p. 379)
chisq_test(armitage,
           distribution = approximate(nresample = 10000)) # chi^2 = 5.91

## Approximative (Monte Carlo) Cochran-Armitage test (Armitage, 1955, p. 379)
(ct <- chisq_test(armitage,
                  distribution = approximate(nresample = 10000),
                  scores = list("Crater" = c(-1.5, -0.5, 0.5, 1.5))))
statistic(ct)^2 # chi_0^2 = 5.26


## Relationship between job satisfaction and income stratified by gender
## Agresti (2002, p. 288, Tab. 7.8)

## Asymptotic generalized Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (Agresti, p. 297)
cmh_test(jobsatisfaction) # CMH = 10.2001

## Asymptotic generalized Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test (Agresti, p. 297)
## Note: 'Job.Satisfaction' as ordinal
cmh_test(jobsatisfaction,
         scores = list("Job.Satisfaction" = c(1, 3, 4, 5))) # L^2 = 9.0342

## Asymptotic linear-by-linear association test (Agresti, p. 297)
## Note: 'Job.Satisfaction' and 'Income' as ordinal
(lt <- lbl_test(jobsatisfaction,
                scores = list("Job.Satisfaction" = c(1, 3, 4, 5),
                              "Income" = c(3, 10, 20, 35))))
statistic(lt)^2 # M^2 = 6.1563
# }

Run the code above in your browser using DataLab