dominanceanalysis (version 2.0.0)

dominanceAnalysis: Dominance analysis for OLS (univariate and multivariate), GLM and LMM models

Description

Dominance analysis for OLS (univariate and multivariate), GLM and LMM models

Usage

dominanceAnalysis(
  x,
  constants = c(),
  terms = NULL,
  fit.functions = "default",
  newdata = NULL,
  null.model = NULL,
  ...
)

Arguments

x

fitted model (lm, glm, betareg), lmWithCov or mlmWithCov object

constants

vector of predictors to remain unchanged between models

terms

vector of terms to be analyzed. By default, obtained from the model

fit.functions

Name of the method used to provide fit indices

newdata

optional data.frame, that update data used on original model

null.model

for mixed models, null model against to test the submodels

...

Other arguments provided to lm or lmer (not implemented yet)

Value

predictors

Vector of predictors.

constants

Vector of constant variables.

terms

Vector of terms to be analyzed.

fit.functions

Vector of fit indices names.

fits

List with raw fits indices. See daRawResults.

contribution.by.level

List of mean contribution of each predictor by level for each fit index. Each element is a data.frame, with levels as rows and predictors as columns, for each fit index.

contribution.average

List with mean contribution of each predictor for all levels. These values are obtained for every fit index considered in the analysis. Each element is a vector of mean contributions for a given fit index.

complete

Matrix for complete dominance.

conditional

Matrix for conditional dominance.

general

Matrix for general dominance.

Definition of Dominance Analysis

Budescu (1993) developed a clear and intuitive definition of importance in regression models, that states that a predictor's importance reflects its contribution in the prediction of the criterion and that one predictor is 'more important than another' if it contributes more to the prediction of the criterion than does its competitor at a given level of analysis.

Types of dominance

The original paper (Bodescu, 1993) defines that variable \(X_1\) dominates \(X_2\) when \(X_1\) is chosen over \(X_2\) in all possible subset of models where only one of these two predictors is to be entered. Later, Azen & Bodescu (2003), name the previously definition as 'complete dominance' and two other types of dominance: conditional and general dominance. Conditional dominance is calculated as the average of the additional contributions to all subset of models of a given model size. General dominance is calculated as the mean of average contribution on each level.

Fit indices availables

To obtain the fit-indices for each model, a function called da.<model>.fit is executed. For example, for a lm model, function da.lm.fit provides \(R^2\) values. Currently, seven models are implemented:

lm

Provides \(R^2\) or coefficient of determination. See da.lm.fit

glm

Provides four fit indices recommended by Azen & Traxel (2009): Cox and Snell(1989), McFadden (1974), Nagelkerke (1991), and Estrella (1998). See da.glm.fit

lmerMod

Provides four fit indices recommended by Lou & Azen (2012). See da.lmerMod.fit

lmWithCov

Provides \(R^2\) for a correlation/covariance matrix. See lmWithCov to create the model and da.lmWithCov.fit for the fit index function.

mlmWithCov

Provides both \(R^2_{XY}\) and \(P^2_{XY}\) for multivariate regression models using a correlation/covariance matrix. See mlmWithCov to create the model and da.mlmWithCov.fit for the fit index function

dynlm

Provides \(R^2\) for dynamic linear models. There is no literature reference about using dominance analysis on dynamic linear models, so you're warned!. See da.dynlm.fit

.

betareg

Provides pseudo-\(R^2\), Cox and Snell(1989), McFadden (1974), and Estrella (1998). You could set the link function using link.betareg if automatic detection of link function doesn't work.

See da.betareg.fit

References

• Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 129-148. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129

• Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2006). Comparing Predictors in Multivariate Regression Models: An Extension of Dominance Analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(2), 157-180. doi:10.3102/10769986031002157

• Azen, R., & Traxel, N. (2009). Using Dominance Analysis to Determine Predictor Importance in Logistic Regression. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(3), 319-347. doi:10.3102/1076998609332754

• Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 542-551. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542

• Luo, W., & Azen, R. (2012). Determining Predictor Importance in Hierarchical Linear Models Using Dominance Analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38(1), 3-31. doi:10.3102/1076998612458319

Examples

# NOT RUN {
data(longley)
lm.1<-lm(Employed~.,longley)
da<-dominanceAnalysis(lm.1)
print(da)
summary(da)
plot(da,which.graph='complete')
plot(da,which.graph='conditional')
plot(da,which.graph='general')

# Maintaining year as a constant on all submodels
da.no.year<-dominanceAnalysis(lm.1,constants='Year')
print(da.no.year)
summary(da.no.year)
plot(da.no.year,which.graph='complete')

# Parameter terms could be used to group variables
da.terms=c(GNP.rel='GNP.deflator+GNP',
           pop.rel='Unemployed+Armed.Forces+Population+Unemployed',
           year='Year')
da.grouped<-dominanceAnalysis(lm.1,terms=da.terms)
print(da.grouped)
summary(da.grouped)
plot(da.grouped, which.graph='complete')
# }