The drake R package
Data analysis can be slow. A round of scientific computation can take several minutes, hours, or even days to complete. After it finishes, if you update your code or data, your hard-earned results may no longer be valid. How much of that valuable output can you keep, and how much do you need to update? How much runtime must you endure all over again?
For projects in R, the drake
package can help. It analyzes your
workflow, skips
steps with up-to-date results, and orchestrates the rest with optional
distributed
computing. At the
end, drake
provides evidence that your results match the underlying
code and data, which increases your ability to trust your research.
6-minute video
Visit the first page of the manual to watch a short introduction.
What gets done stays done.
Too many data science projects follow a Sisyphean loop:
- Launch the code.
- Wait while it runs.
- Discover an issue.
- Rerun from scratch.
Ordinarily, it is hard to avoid rerunning the code from scratch.
But with drake
, you can automatically
- Launch the parts that changed since last time.
- Skip the rest.
How it works
To set up a project, load your packages,
library(drake)
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
load your custom functions,
create_plot <- function(data) {
ggplot(data, aes(x = Petal.Width, fill = Species)) +
geom_histogram()
}
check any supporting files (optional),
# Get the files with drake_example("main").
file.exists("raw_data.xlsx")
#> [1] TRUE
file.exists("report.Rmd")
#> [1] TRUE
and plan what you are going to do.
plan <- drake_plan(
raw_data = readxl::read_excel(file_in("raw_data.xlsx")),
data = raw_data %>%
mutate(Species = forcats::fct_inorder(Species)),
hist = create_plot(data),
fit = lm(Sepal.Width ~ Petal.Width + Species, data),
report = rmarkdown::render(
knitr_in("report.Rmd"),
output_file = file_out("report.html"),
quiet = TRUE
)
)
plan
#> # A tibble: 5 x 2
#> target command
#> <chr> <expr>
#> 1 raw_data readxl::read_excel(file_in("raw_data.xlsx")) …
#> 2 data raw_data %>% mutate(Species = forcats::fct_inorder(Species)) …
#> 3 hist create_plot(data) …
#> 4 fit lm(Sepal.Width ~ Petal.Width + Species, data) …
#> 5 report rmarkdown::render(knitr_in("report.Rmd"), output_file = file_ou…
So far, we have just been setting the stage. Use make()
to do the real
work. Targets are built in the correct order regardless of the row order
of plan
.
make(plan)
#> target raw_data
#> target data
#> target fit
#> target hist
#> target report
Except for files like report.html
, your output is stored in a hidden
.drake/
folder. Reading it back is easy.
readd(data) # See also loadd().
#> # A tibble: 150 x 5
#> Sepal.Length Sepal.Width Petal.Length Petal.Width Species
#> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <fct>
#> 1 5.1 3.5 1.4 0.2 setosa
#> 2 4.9 3 1.4 0.2 setosa
#> 3 4.7 3.2 1.3 0.2 setosa
#> 4 4.6 3.1 1.5 0.2 setosa
#> 5 5 3.6 1.4 0.2 setosa
#> 6 5.4 3.9 1.7 0.4 setosa
#> 7 4.6 3.4 1.4 0.3 setosa
#> 8 5 3.4 1.5 0.2 setosa
#> 9 4.4 2.9 1.4 0.2 setosa
#> 10 4.9 3.1 1.5 0.1 setosa
#> # … with 140 more rows
You may look back on your work and see room for improvement, but it’s
all good! The whole point of drake
is to help you go back and change
things quickly and painlessly. For example, we forgot to give our
histogram a bin width.
readd(hist)
#> `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
So let’s fix the plotting function.
create_plot <- function(data) {
ggplot(data, aes(x = Petal.Width, fill = Species)) +
geom_histogram(binwidth = 0.25) +
theme_gray(20)
}
drake
knows which results are affected.
config <- drake_config(plan)
vis_drake_graph(config) # Interactive graph: zoom, drag, etc.
The next make()
just builds hist
and report.html
. No point in
wasting time on the data or model.
make(plan)
#> target hist
#> target report
loadd(hist)
hist
Reproducibility with confidence
The R community emphasizes reproducibility. Traditional themes include
scientific
replicability,
literate programming with knitr, and
version control with
git.
But internal consistency is important too. Reproducibility carries the
promise that your output matches the code and data you say you used.
With the exception of non-default
triggers and
hasty
mode,
drake
strives to keep this promise.
Evidence
Suppose you are reviewing someone else’s data analysis project for
reproducibility. You scrutinize it carefully, checking that the datasets
are available and the documentation is thorough. But could you re-create
the results without the help of the original author? With drake
, it is
quick and easy to find out.
make(plan)
#> All targets are already up to date.
config <- drake_config(plan)
outdated(config)
#> character(0)
With everything already up to date, you have tangible evidence of reproducibility. Even though you did not re-create the results, you know the results are re-creatable. They faithfully show what the code is producing. Given the right package environment and system configuration, you have everything you need to reproduce all the output by yourself.
Ease
When it comes time to actually rerun the entire project, you have much more confidence. Starting over from scratch is trivially easy.
clean() # Remove the original author's results.
make(plan) # Independently re-create the results from the code and input data.
#> target raw_data
#> target data
#> target fit
#> target hist
#> target report
History and provenance
As of version 7.5.0, drake
tracks the history and provenance of your
targets: what you built, when you built it, how you built it, the
arguments you used in your function calls, and how to get the data back.
(Disable with make(history = FALSE)
)
history <- drake_history(analyze = TRUE)
history
#> # A tibble: 12 x 10
#> target time hash exists command runtime seed latest quiet
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <lgl> <chr> <dbl> <int> <lgl> <lgl>
#> 1 data 2019… e580… TRUE raw_da… 0.001 1.29e9 FALSE NA
#> 2 data 2019… e580… TRUE raw_da… 0 1.29e9 TRUE NA
#> 3 fit 2019… 62a1… TRUE lm(Sep… 0.002 1.11e9 FALSE NA
#> 4 fit 2019… 62a1… TRUE lm(Sep… 0.001000 1.11e9 TRUE NA
#> 5 hist 2019… 10bc… TRUE create… 0.006 2.10e8 FALSE NA
#> 6 hist 2019… 5252… TRUE create… 0.004 2.10e8 FALSE NA
#> 7 hist 2019… 00fa… TRUE create… 0.007 2.10e8 TRUE NA
#> 8 raw_d… 2019… 6317… TRUE "readx… 0.009 1.20e9 FALSE NA
#> 9 raw_d… 2019… 6317… TRUE "readx… 0.00600 1.20e9 TRUE NA
#> 10 report 2019… 3e2b… TRUE "rmark… 0.481 1.30e9 FALSE TRUE
#> 11 report 2019… 3e2b… TRUE "rmark… 0.358 1.30e9 FALSE TRUE
#> 12 report 2019… 3e2b… TRUE "rmark… 0.356 1.30e9 TRUE TRUE
#> # … with 1 more variable: output_file <chr>
Remarks:
- The
quiet
column appears above because one of thedrake_plan()
commands hasknit(quiet = TRUE)
. - The
hash
column identifies all the previous the versions of your targets. As long asexists
isTRUE
, you can recover old data. - Advanced: if you use
make(cache_log_file = TRUE)
and put the cache log file under version control, you can match the hashes fromdrake_history()
with thegit
commit history of your code.
Let’s use the history to recover the oldest histogram.
hash <- history %>%
filter(target == "hist") %>%
pull(hash) %>%
head(n = 1)
cache <- drake_cache()
cache$get_value(hash)
#> `stat_bin()` using `bins = 30`. Pick better value with `binwidth`.
Automated recovery and renaming
Note: this feature is still experimental.
In drake
version 7.5.0 and above, make(recover = TRUE)
can salvage
old targets from the distant past. This may not be a good idea if your
external dependencies have changed a lot over time (R version, package
environment, etc) but it can be useful under the right circumstances.
# Is the data really gone?
clean() # garbage_collection = FALSE
# Nope!
make(plan, recover = TRUE) # The report still builds since report.md is gone.
#> recover raw_data
#> recover data
#> recover fit
#> recover hist
#> target report
# When was the raw data *really* first built?
diagnose(raw_data)$date
#> [1] "2019-07-18 20:19:48.110163 -0400 GMT"
You can even rename your targets! All you have to do is use the same target seed as last time. Just be aware that this invalidates downstream targets.
# Get the old seed.
old_seed <- diagnose(data)$seed
# Now rename the data and supply the old seed.
plan <- drake_plan(
raw_data = readxl::read_excel(file_in("raw_data.xlsx")),
# Previously just named "data".
iris_data = target(
raw_data %>%
mutate(Species = forcats::fct_inorder(Species)),
seed = !!old_seed
),
# `iris_data` will be recovered from `data`,
# but `hist` and `fit` have changed commands,
# so they will build from scratch.
hist = create_plot(iris_data),
fit = lm(Sepal.Width ~ Petal.Width + Species, iris_data),
report = rmarkdown::render(
knitr_in("report.Rmd"),
output_file = file_out("report.html"),
quiet = TRUE
)
)
make(plan, recover = TRUE)
#> recover iris_data
#> target fit
#> target hist
#> target report
Independent replication
With even more evidence and confidence, you can invest the time to
independently replicate the original code base if necessary. Up until
this point, you relied on basic drake
functions such as make()
, so
you may not have needed to peek at any substantive author-defined code
in advance. In that case, you can stay usefully ignorant as you
reimplement the original author’s methodology. In other words, drake
could potentially improve the integrity of independent replication.
Readability and transparency
Ideally, independent observers should be able to read your code and
understand it. drake
helps in several ways.
- The workflow plan data
frame
explicitly outlines the steps of the analysis, and
vis_drake_graph()
visualizes how those steps depend on each other. drake
takes care of the parallel scheduling and high-performance computing (HPC) for you. That means the HPC code is no longer tangled up with the code that actually expresses your ideas.- You can generate large collections of targets without necessarily changing your code base of imported functions, another nice separation between the concepts and the execution of your workflow
Scale up and out.
Not every project can complete in a single R session on your laptop.
Some projects need more speed or computing power. Some require a few
local processor cores, and some need large high-performance computing
systems. But parallel computing is hard. Your tables and figures depend
on your analysis results, and your analyses depend on your datasets, so
some tasks must finish before others even begin. drake
knows what to
do. Parallelism is implicit and automatic. See the high-performance
computing guide
for all the details.
# Use the spare cores on your local machine.
make(plan, jobs = 4)
# Or scale up to a supercomputer.
drake_hpc_template_file("slurm_clustermq.tmpl") # https://slurm.schedmd.com/
options(
clustermq.scheduler = "clustermq",
clustermq.template = "slurm_clustermq.tmpl"
)
make(plan, parallelism = "clustermq", jobs = 4)
Installation
You can choose among different versions of drake
. The CRAN release
often lags behind the online
manual but may have fewer
bugs.
# Install the latest stable release from CRAN.
install.packages("drake")
# Alternatively, install the development version from GitHub.
install.packages("devtools")
library(devtools)
install_github("ropensci/drake")
Function reference
The reference section lists all the available functions. Here are the most important ones.
drake_plan()
: create a workflow data frame (likemy_plan
).make()
: build your project.drake_history()
: show what you built, when you built it, and the function arguments you used.r_make()
: launch a freshcallr::r()
process to build your project. Called from an interactive R session,r_make()
is more reproducible thanmake()
.loadd()
: load one or more built targets into your R session.readd()
: read and return a built target.drake_config()
: create a master configuration list for other user-side functions.vis_drake_graph()
: show an interactive visual network representation of your workflow.recoverable()
: Which targets can we salvage usingmake(recover = TRUE)
(experimental).outdated()
: see which targets will be built in the nextmake()
.deps()
: check the dependencies of a command or function.failed()
: list the targets that failed to build in the lastmake()
.diagnose()
: return the full context of a build, including errors, warnings, and messages.
Documentation
- The user manual
- The reference website.
- The official repository of example
code. Download an
example workflow from here with
drake_example()
. drakeplanner
, an R/Shiny app to help learndrake
and create new projects. Run locally withdrakeplanner::drakeplanner()
or access it at https://wlandau.shinyapps.io/drakeplanner.learndrake
, an R package for teaching an extendeddrake
workshop. It contains notebooks, slides, Shiny apps, the latter two of which are publicly deployed. See the README for instructions and links.- Presentations and workshops by Will Landau, Kirill Müller, Amanda Dobbyn, Karthik Ram, Sina Rüeger, Christine Stawitz, and others. See specific links at https://ropenscilabs.github.io/drake-manual/index.html#presentations
- The FAQ page, which links to appropriately-labeled issues on GitHub.
Use cases
The official rOpenSci use cases and
associated discussion threads
describe applications of drake
in action. Here are some more
applications of drake
in real-world
projects.
- efcaguab/demografia-del-voto
- efcaguab/great-white-shark-nsw
- IndianaCHE/Detailed-SSP-Reports
- joelnitta/pleurosoriopsis
- pat-s/pathogen-modeling
- sol-eng/tensorflow-w-r
- tiernanmartin/home-and-hope
Help and troubleshooting
The following resources document many known issues and challenges.
- Frequently-asked questions.
- Cautionary notes and edge cases
- Debugging and testing drake projects
- Other known issues (please search both open and closed ones).
If you are still having trouble, please submit a new issue with a bug report or feature request, along with a minimal reproducible example where appropriate.
The GitHub issue tracker is mainly intended for bug reports and feature
requests. While questions about usage etc. are also highly encouraged,
you may alternatively wish to post to Stack
Overflow and use the drake-r-package
tag.
Contributing
Development is a community effort, and we encourage participation. Please read CONTRIBUTING.md for details.
Similar work
drake
enhances reproducibility and high-performance computing, but not
in all respects. Literate programming,
local library managers,
containerization, and strict session
managers offer more robust
solutions in their respective domains. And for the problems drake
does solve, it stands on the shoulders of the giants that came before.
Pipeline tools
GNU Make
The original idea of a time-saving reproducible build system extends back at least as far as GNU Make, which still aids the work of data scientists as well as the original user base of complied language programmers. In fact, the name “drake” stands for “Data Frames in R for Make”. Make is used widely in reproducible research. Below are some examples from Karl Broman’s website.
- Bostock, Mike (2013). “A map of flowlines from NHDPlus.” https://github.com/mbostock/us-rivers. Powered by the Makefile at https://github.com/mbostock/us-rivers/blob/master/Makefile.
- Broman, Karl W (2012). “Halotype Probabilities in Advanced
Intercross Populations.” G3 2(2), 199-202.Powered by the
Makefile
at https://github.com/kbroman/ailProbPaper/blob/master/Makefile. - Broman, Karl W (2012). “Genotype Probabilities at Intermediate Generations in the Construction of Recombinant Inbred Lines.” *Genetics 190(2), 403-412. Powered by the Makefile at https://github.com/kbroman/preCCProbPaper/blob/master/Makefile.
- Broman, Karl W and Kim, Sungjin and Sen, Saunak and Ane, Cecile and
Payseur, Bret A (2012). “Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci onto a
Phylogenetic Tree.” Genetics 192(2), 267-279. Powered by the
Makefile
at https://github.com/kbroman/phyloQTLpaper/blob/master/Makefile.
Whereas GNU Make is
language-agnostic, drake
is fundamentally designed for R.
- Instead of a
Makefile,
drake
supports an R-friendly domain-specific language for declaring targets. - Targets in GNU Make are files,
whereas targets in
drake
are arbitrary variables in memory. (drake
does have opt-in support for files viafile_out()
,file_in()
, andknitr_in()
.)drake
caches these objects in its own storage system so R users rarely have to think about output files.
Remake
remake itself is no longer maintained, but its founding design goals and principles live on through drake. In fact, drake is a direct reimagining of remake with enhanced scalability, reproducibility, high-performance computing, visualization, and documentation.
Factual’s Drake
Factual’s Drake is similar in concept, but the development effort is completely unrelated to the drake R package.
Other pipeline tools
There are countless other successful pipeline
toolkits. The drake
package distinguishes itself with its R-focused approach,
Tidyverse-friendly interface, and a thorough selection of parallel
computing technologies and scheduling
algorithms.
Memoization
Memoization is the strategic caching of the return values of functions.
It is a lightweight approach to the core problem that drake
and other
pipeline tools are trying to solve. Every time a memoized function is
called with a new set of arguments, the return value is saved for future
use. Later, whenever the same function is called with the same
arguments, the previous return value is salvaged, and the function call
is skipped to save time. The
memoise
package is the primary
implementation of memoization in R.
Memoization saves time for small projects, but it arguably does not go
far enough for large reproducible pipelines. In reality, the return
value of a function depends not only on the function body and the
arguments, but also on any nested functions and global variables, the
dependencies of those dependencies, and so on upstream. drake
tracks
this deeper context, while memoise
does not.
Literate programming
Literate programming is the practice of narrating code in plain vernacular. The goal is to communicate the research process clearly, transparently, and reproducibly. Whereas commented code is still mostly code, literate knitr / R Markdown reports can become websites, presentation slides, lecture notes, serious scientific manuscripts, and even books.
knitr and R Markdown
drake
and knitr are symbiotic. drake
’s
job is to manage large computation and orchestrate the demanding tasks
of a complex data analysis pipeline.
knitr’s job is to communicate those
expensive results after drake
computes them.
knitr / R
Markdown reports are small pieces of an
overarching drake
pipeline. They should focus on communication, and
they should do as little computation as possible.
To insert a knitr report in a drake
pipeline, use the knitr_in()
function inside your drake
plan, and use
loadd()
and readd()
to refer to targets in the report itself. See an
example
here.
Version control
drake
is not a version control tool. However, it is fully compatible
with git
,
svn
, and similar
software. In fact, it is good practice to use
git
alongside drake
for reproducible
workflows.
However, data poses a challenge. The datasets created by make()
can
get large and numerous, and it is not recommended to put the .drake/
cache or the .drake_history/
logs under version control. Instead, it
is recommended to use a data storage solution such as
DropBox or
OSF.
Containerization and R package environments
drake
does not track R packages or system dependencies for changes.
Instead, it defers to tools like Docker,
Singularity,
renv
, and
packrat
, which create
self-contained portable environments to reproducibly isolate and ship
data analysis projects. drake
is fully compatible with these tools.
workflowr
The workflowr
package is a
project manager that focuses on literate programming, sharing over the
web, file organization, and version control. Its brand of
reproducibility is all about transparency, communication, and
discoverability. For an example of
workflowr
and drake
working together, see this machine learning
project
by Patrick Schratz
(source).
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Jarad Niemi, my advisor from
graduate school, for first introducing me
to the idea of Makefiles for
research. He originally set me down the path that led to drake
.
Many thanks to Julia Lowndes, Ben Marwick, and Peter Slaughter for reviewing drake for rOpenSci, and to Maëlle Salmon for such active involvement as the editor. Thanks also to the following people for contributing early in development.
- Alex Axthelm
- Chan-Yub Park
- Daniel Falster
- Eric Nantz
- Henrik Bengtsson
- Ian Watson
- Jasper Clarkberg
- Kendon Bell
- Kirill Müller
- Michael Schubert
Credit for images is attributed here.