## EXAMPLE 1 (from Woodward 2005 p. 412):
## A case-control study of the relationship between smoking and CHD is
## planned. A sample of men with newly diagnosed CHD will be compared for
## smoking status with a sample of controls. Assuming an equal number of
## cases and controls, how many study subject are required to detect an
## odds ratio of 2.0 with 0.90 power using a two-sided 0.05 test? Previous
## surveys have shown that around 0.30 of males without CHD are smokers.
epi.ccsize(OR = 2.0, p0 = 0.30, n = NA, power = 0.90, r = 1, rho = 0,
design = 1, sided.test = 2, conf.level = 0.95, method = "unmatched",
fleiss = FALSE)
## A total of 376 men need to be sampled: 188 cases and 188 controls.
## EXAMPLE 2 (from Woodward p 414):
## Suppose we wish to determine the power to detect an odds ratio of 2.0
## using a two-sided 0.05 test when 188 cases and 940 controls
## are available (that is, the ratio of controls to cases is 5:1). Assume
## the prevalence of smoking in males without CHD is 0.30.
n <- 188 + 940
epi.ccsize(OR = 2.0, p0 = 0.30, n = n, power = NA, r = 5, rho = 0,
design = 1, sided.test = 2, conf.level = 0.95, method = "unmatched",
fleiss = TRUE)
## The power of this study, with the given sample size allocation is 0.99.
## EXAMPLE 3:
## The following statement appeared in a study proposal to identify risk
## factors for campylobacteriosis in humans:
## `We will prospectively recruit 300 culture-confirmed Campylobacter cases
## reported under the Public Health Act. We will then recruit one control per
## case from General Practices of the enrolled cases, using frequency matching
## by age and sex. With exposure levels of 10% (thought to be realistic
## given past foodborne disease case control studies) this sample size
## will provide 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 2 at the 5% alpha
## level.'
## Confirm the statement that 300 case subjects will provide 80% power in
## this study.
epi.ccsize(OR = 2.0, p0 = 0.10, n = 600, power = NA, r = 1, rho = 0.01,
design = 1, sided.test = 2, conf.level = 0.95, method = "matched",
fleiss = TRUE)
## If the true odds ratio for Campylobacter in exposed subjects relative to
## unexposed subjects is 2.0 we will be able to reject the null hypothesis
## that this odds ratio equals 1 with probability (power) 0.826. The Type I
# error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05.
## EXAMPLE 4:
## We wish to conduct a case-control study to assess whether bladder cancer
## may be associated with past exposure to cigarette smoking. Cases will be
## patients with bladder cancer and controls will be patients hospitalised
## for injury. It is assumed that 20% of controls will be smokers or past
## smokers, and we wish to detect an odds ratio of 2 with power 90%.
## Three controls will be recruited for every case.
epi.ccsize(OR = 2.0, p0 = 0.20, n = NA, power = 0.90, r = 3, rho = 0,
design = 1, sided.test = 2, conf.level = 0.95, method = "unmatched",
fleiss = FALSE)
## A total of 600 subjects need to be enrolled in the study: 150 cases and
## 450 controls.
## An alternative is to conduct a matched case-control study rather than the
## unmatched design outlined above. One case will be matched to one control
## and the correlation between case and control exposures for matched pairs
## (rho) is estimated to be 0.01 (low). With all other parameters equal to
## above specified, how many study subjects will be required?
epi.ccsize(OR = 2.0, p0 = 0.20, n = NA, power = 0.90, r = 1, rho = 0.01,
design = 1, sided.test = 2, conf.level = 0.95, method = "matched",
fleiss = FALSE)
## A total of 456 subjects need to be enrolled in the study: 228 cases and
## 228 controls.
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab