Extract and export model-based variable importance from a familiarCollection.
export_model_vimp(
object,
dir_path = NULL,
aggregate_results = TRUE,
aggregation_method = waiver(),
rank_threshold = waiver(),
export_collection = FALSE,
...
)# S4 method for familiarCollection
export_model_vimp(
object,
dir_path = NULL,
aggregate_results = TRUE,
aggregation_method = waiver(),
rank_threshold = waiver(),
export_collection = FALSE,
...
)
# S4 method for ANY
export_model_vimp(
object,
dir_path = NULL,
aggregate_results = TRUE,
aggregation_method = waiver(),
rank_threshold = waiver(),
export_collection = FALSE,
...
)
A data.table (if dir_path is not provided), or nothing, as all data
is exported to csv files.
A familiarCollection object, or other other objects from which
a familiarCollection can be extracted. See details for more information.
Path to folder where extracted data should be saved. NULL
will allow export as a structured list of data.tables.
Flag that signifies whether results should be aggregated for export.
(optional) The method used to aggregate variable importances over different data subsets, e.g. bootstraps. The following methods can be selected:
mean (default): Use the mean rank of a feature over the subsets to
determine the aggregated feature rank.
median: Use the median rank of a feature over the subsets to determine
the aggregated feature rank.
best: Use the best rank the feature obtained in any subset to determine
the aggregated feature rank.
worst: Use the worst rank the feature obtained in any subset to
determine the aggregated feature rank.
stability: Use the frequency of the feature being in the subset of
highly ranked features as measure for the aggregated feature rank
(Meinshausen and Buehlmann, 2010).
exponential: Use a rank-weighted frequence of occurrence in the subset
of highly ranked features as measure for the aggregated feature rank (Haury
et al., 2011).
borda: Use the borda count as measure for the aggregated feature rank
(Wald et al., 2012).
enhanced_borda: Use an occurrence frequency-weighted borda count as
measure for the aggregated feature rank (Wald et al., 2012).
truncated_borda: Use borda count computed only on features within the
subset of highly ranked features.
enhanced_truncated_borda: Apply both the enhanced borda method and the
truncated borda method and use the resulting borda count as the aggregated
feature rank.
(optional) The threshold used to define the subset of highly important features. If not set, this threshold is determined by maximising the variance in the occurrence value over all features over the subset size.
This parameter is only relevant for stability, exponential,
enhanced_borda, truncated_borda and enhanced_truncated_borda methods.
(optional) Exports the collection if TRUE.
Arguments passed on to as_familiar_collection
familiar_data_namesNames of the dataset(s). Only used if the object
parameter is one or more familiarData objects.
collection_nameName of the collection.
Data, such as model performance and calibration information, is
usually collected from a familiarCollection object. However, you can also
provide one or more familiarData objects, that will be internally
converted to a familiarCollection object. It is also possible to provide a
familiarEnsemble or one or more familiarModel objects together with the
data from which data is computed prior to export. Paths to the previous
files can also be provided.
All parameters aside from object and dir_path are only used if object
is not a familiarCollection object, or a path to one.
Variable importance is based on the ranking produced by model-specific
variable importance routines, e.g. permutation for random forests. If such a
routine is absent, variable importance is based on the feature selection
method that led to the features included in the model. In case multiple
models (familiarModel objects) are combined, feature ranks are first
aggregated using the method defined by the aggregation_method, some of
which require a rank_threshold to indicate a subset of most important
features.
Information concerning highly similar features that form clusters is provided as well. This information is based on consensus clustering of the features that were used in the signatures of the underlying models. This clustering information is also used during aggregation to ensure that co-clustered features are only taken into account once.