The function quantifies components of shape variation for a set of specimens as described by their patterns of symmetry
and asymmetry. Here, shape variation is decomposed into variation among individuals, variation among sides (directional
asymmetry), and variation due to an individual x side interaction (fluctuating symmetry). These components are then
statistically evaluated using Procrustes ANOVA. Statistical assessment of model effects for shape variation is accomplished using permutation procedures.
Methods for both matching symmetry and object symmetry can be implemented. Matching symmetry is when each object contains mirrored
pairs of structures (e.g., right and left hands) while object symmetry is when a single object is symmetric
about a midline (e.g., right and left sides of human faces). Details on general approaches for the study of symmetry in geometric
morphometrics may be found in: Mardia et al. 2000; Klingenberg et al. 2002.
As input, the function receives either A 3D array (p x k x n) containing raw landmarks (requiring
GPA to be performed) or a gpagen object (if GPA has been previously performed) or a geomorphShapes object.
If one wishes to incorporate semilandmarks, GPA can either be performed first using gpagen, or within bilat.symmetry
by passing adequate GPA arguments (i.e. curves, surfaces, ProcD etc, see gpagen. If a geomorphShapes
object is provided, semilandmarks are automatically identified and slided during GPA.
For "object.sym = FALSE, landmarks should be of dimension (p x k x 2n), as each specimen is
represented by both left and right configurations.
Analyses of symmetry for matched pairs of objects is implemented when object.sym=FALSE. Here, a 3D array [p x k x 2n]
contains the landmark coordinates for all pairs of structures (2 structures for each of n specimens). Because the two sets of
structures are on opposite sides, they represent mirror images, and one set must be reflected prior to the analysis to
allow landmark correspondence. IT IS ASSUMED THAT THE USER HAS DONE THIS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE SYMMETRY ANALYSIS.
Reflecting a set of specimens may be accomplished by multiplying one coordinate dimension
by '-1' for these structures (either the x-, the y-, or the z-dimension). A vector containing information on individuals
and sides must also be supplied. Replicates of each specimen may also be included in the dataset, and when specified will be
used as measurement error (see Klingenberg and McIntyre 1998).
Analyses of object symmetry is implemented when object.sym=TRUE. Here, a 3D array [p x k x n] contains the landmark
coordinates for all n specimens. To obtain information about asymmetry, the function generates a second set of objects
by reflecting them about one of their coordinate axes. The landmarks across the line of symmetry are then relabeled to obtain
landmark correspondence. The user must supply a list of landmark pairs. A vector containing information on individuals
must also be supplied. Replicates of each specimen may also be included in the dataset, and when specified will be
used as measurement error.
Notes for geomorph 3.0
Compared to older versions of geomorph, some results can be expected to be slightly different. Starting with geomorph 3.0,
results use only type I sums of squares (SS) with either full randomization of raw shape values or RRPP (preferred with nested terms)
for analysis of variance (ANOVA). Older versions used a combination of parametric and non-parametric results, as well as a combination
of type I and type III SS. While analytical conclusions should be consistent (i.e., "significance" of effects is the same), these
updates maintain consistency in analytical philosophy. This change will require longer computation time for large datasets, but the trade-off
allows users to have more flexibility and eliminates combining disparate analytical philosophies.
Note also that significance of terms in the
model are found by comparing F-values for each term to those obtained via permutation. F-ratios and df are not strictly necessary (a ratio of SS would suffice),
but they are reported as is standard for anova tables. Additionally, users will notice that the df reported are based on the number of observations rather than
a combination of objects * coordinates * dimensions, as is sometimes found in morphometric studies of symmetry. However, this change has no effect
on hypothesis testing, as only SS vary among permutations (df, coordinates, and dimensions are constants).
The generic functions, print, summary, and plot all work with bilat.symmetry.