gsDesign (version 3.5.0)

sfPower: Kim-DeMets (power) Spending Function

Description

The function sfPower() implements a Kim-DeMets (power) spending function. This is a flexible, one-parameter spending function recommended by Jennison and Turnbull (2000). Normally it will be passed to gsDesign() in the parameter sfu for the upper bound or sfl for the lower bound to specify a spending function family for a design. In this case, the user does not need to know the calling sequence. The calling sequence is useful, however, when the user wishes to plot a spending function as demonstrated below in examples.

A Kim-DeMets spending function takes the form $$f(t;\alpha,\rho)=\alpha t^\rho$$ where \(\rho\) is the value passed in param. See examples below for a range of values of \(\rho\) that may be of interest (param=0.75 to 3 are documented there).

Usage

sfPower(alpha, t, param)

Value

An object of type spendfn. See Spending_Function_Overview for further details.

Arguments

alpha

Real value \(> 0\) and no more than 1. Normally, alpha=0.025 for one-sided Type I error specification or alpha=0.1 for Type II error specification. However, this could be set to 1 if for descriptive purposes you wish to see the proportion of spending as a function of the proportion of sample size/information.

t

A vector of points with increasing values from 0 to 1, inclusive. Values of the proportion of sample size/information for which the spending function will be computed.

param

A single, positive value specifying the \(\rho\) parameter for which Kim-DeMets spending is to be computed; allowable range is (0,50]

Author

Keaven Anderson

References

Jennison C and Turnbull BW (2000), Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.

See Also

Spending_Function_Overview, gsDesign, gsDesign package overview

Examples

library(ggplot2)
# design a 4-analysis trial using a Kim-DeMets spending function
# for both lower and upper bounds
x <- gsDesign(k = 4, sfu = sfPower, sfupar = 3, sfl = sfPower, sflpar = 1.5)

# print the design
x

# plot the spending function using many points to obtain a smooth curve
# show rho=3 for approximation to O'Brien-Fleming and rho=.75 for
# approximation to Pocock design.
# Also show rho=2 for an intermediate spending.
# Compare these to Hwang-Shih-DeCani spending with gamma=-4,  -2,  1
t <- 0:100 / 100
plot(t, sfPower(0.025, t, 3)$spend,
  xlab = "Proportion of sample size",
  ylab = "Cumulative Type I error spending",
  main = "Kim-DeMets (rho) versus Hwang-Shih-DeCani (gamma) Spending",
  type = "l", cex.main = .9
)
lines(t, sfPower(0.025, t, 2)$spend, lty = 2)
lines(t, sfPower(0.025, t, 0.75)$spend, lty = 3)
lines(t, sfHSD(0.025, t, 1)$spend, lty = 3, col = 2)
lines(t, sfHSD(0.025, t, -2)$spend, lty = 2, col = 2)
lines(t, sfHSD(0.025, t, -4)$spend, lty = 1, col = 2)
legend(
  x = c(.0, .375), y = .025 * c(.65, 1), lty = 1:3,
  legend = c("rho= 3", "rho= 2", "rho= 0.75")
)
legend(
  x = c(.0, .357), y = .025 * c(.65, .85), lty = 1:3, bty = "n", col = 2,
  legend = c("gamma= -4", "gamma= -2", "gamma=1")
)