intamap (version 1.5-7)

yamamotoKrige: kriging and simulation with alternative kriging variance

Description

ordinary kriging and simulation with an alternative kriging variance

Usage

yamamotoKrige(formula, Obs, newPoints, model, nsim = 0, nmax = 20, maxdist = Inf)

Value

Either a Spatial*DataFrame with predictions and prediction variance, in the columns var1.pred and var1.var, together with the classical ordinary kriging variance in var1.ok, or simulations with column names simx where x is the number of the simulation.

Arguments

formula

formula that defines the dependent variable as a linear model of independent variables; suppose the dependent variable has name z, for ordinary and simple kriging use the formula z~1; only ordinary kriging is currently implemented, formula is hence mainly used to identify the dependent variable

Obs

SpatialPointsDataFrame with observations

newPoints

Spatial object with prediction locations, either points or grid

model

variogram model - of the type that can be found by a call to vgm

nsim

integer; if set to a non-zero value, conditional simulation is used instead of kriging interpolation. For this, sequential Gaussian simulation is used, following a single random path through the data.

nmax

for local kriging: the number of nearest observations that should be used for a kriging prediction or simulation, where nearest is defined in terms of the space of the spatial locations. By default, all observations are used.

maxdist

maximum number of neighbours to use in local kriging, defaults to Inf

Author

Jon Olav Skoien

Details

The term yamamotoKrige comes from the paper of Yamamoto (2000) where he suggests using local variance around the kriging estimate (weighted with the kriging weights) as an alternative kriging variance. This as a solution to more reliable estimates of the kriging variance also when the stationarity assumption has been violated. The method was applied by Skoien et al. (2008), who showed that it can have advantages for cases where the stationarity assumption behind kriging is violated.

If the number of observations is high, it is recommended have nmax lower. This is partly because the method relies on positive kriging weights. The method to do this adds the norm of the largest negative weight to all weights, and rescales. This tends to smooth the weights, giving a prediction closer to the average if a too large number of observation locations is used.

References

Skoien, J. O., G. B. M. Heuvelink, and E. J. Pebesma. 2008. Unbiased block predictions and exceedance probabilities for environmental thresholds. In: J. Ortiz C. and X. Emery (eds). Proceedings of the eight international geostatistics congress. Santiago, Chile: Gecamin, pp. 831-840.

Yamamoto, J. K. 2000. An alternative measure of the reliability of ordinary kriging estimates. Mathematical Geology, 32 (4), 489-509.

Pebesma, E., Cornford, D., Dubois, G., Heuvelink, G.B.M., Hristopulos, D., Pilz, J., Stohlker, U., Morin, G., Skoien, J.O. INTAMAP: The design and implementation f an interoperable automated interpolation Web Service. Computers and Geosciences 37 (3), 2011.

Examples

library(gstat)
library(automap)
data(sic2004)
coordinates(sic.val) = ~x+y
coordinates(sic.test) = ~x+y
variogramModel = autofitVariogram(joker~1,sic.val)$var_model
newData = yamamotoKrige(joker~1,sic.val,sic.test,variogramModel,nmax = 20)
summary(newData)
plot(sqrt(var1.ok)~var1.pred,newData) 
# Kriging variance the same in regions with extreme values
plot(sqrt(var1.var)~var1.pred,newData) 
# Kriging standard deviation higher for high predictions (close to extreme values)