merMod
predictionsThis function generates predictions for merMod
models, but
with the ability to get standard errors as well.
predict_merMod(
object,
newdata = NULL,
se.fit = FALSE,
use.re.var = FALSE,
allow.new.levels = FALSE,
type = c("link", "response", "terms"),
na.action = na.pass,
re.form = NULL,
boot = FALSE,
sims = 100,
prog.arg = "none",
...
)
a fitted model object
data frame for which to evaluate predictions.
Include standard errors with the predictions? Note that these standard errors by default include only fixed effects variance. See details for more info. Default is FALSE.
If se.fit
is TRUE, include random effects variance in
standard errors? Default is FALSE.
logical if new levels (or NA values) in
newdata
are allowed. If FALSE (default), such new values in
newdata
will trigger an error; if TRUE, then the prediction
will use the unconditional (population-level) values for data with
previously unobserved levels (or NAs).
character string - either "link"
, the default, or
"response"
indicating the type of prediction object returned.
(formula, NULL
, or NA
) specify which random effects to condition on when predicting. If NULL
,
include all random effects; if NA
or ~0
,
include no random effects.
Use bootstrapping (via lme4::bootMer()
) to estimate
variance for se.fit
? Default is FALSE
If boot
is TRUE, how many simulations should be run? Default
is 100.
If boot
and se.fit
are TRUE, a character string -
type of progress bar to display. Default is "none"; the function will look
for a relevant *ProgressBar function, so "txt" will work in general;
"tk" is available if the tcltk package is loaded; or "win" on Windows
systems. Progress bars are disabled (with a message) for parallel operation.
When boot
and se.fit
are TRUE, any additional arguments are
passed to lme4::bootMer()
.
The developers of lme4 omit an se.fit
argument for a
reason, which is that it's not perfectly clear how best to estimate
the variance for these models. This solution is a logical one, but perhaps
not perfect. Bayesian models are one way to do better.
The method used here is based on the one described here: http://bbolker.github.io/mixedmodels-misc/glmmFAQ.html#predictions-andor-confidence-or-prediction-intervals-on-predictions