mhmkin: Fit nonlinear mixed-effects models built from one or more kinetic degradation models and one or more error models

Description

The name of the methods expresses that (multiple) hierarchichal (also known as multilevel) multicompartment kinetic models are fitted. Our kinetic models are nonlinear, so we can use various nonlinear mixed-effects model fitting functions.

Usage

mhmkin(objects, ...)
# S3 method for mmkin
mhmkin(objects, ...)
# S3 method for list
mhmkin(
  objects,
  backend = "saemix",
  algorithm = "saem",
  no_random_effect = NULL,
  ...,
  cores = if (Sys.info()["sysname"] == "Windows") 1 else parallel::detectCores(),
  cluster = NULL
)
# S3 method for mhmkin
[(x, i, j, ..., drop = FALSE)
# S3 method for mhmkin
print(x, ...)

Value

A two-dimensional array of fit objects and/or try-errors that can be indexed using the degradation model names for the first index (row index) and the error model names for the second index (column index), with class attribute 'mhmkin'.

An object inheriting from mhmkin.

Arguments

objects: A list of mmkin objects containing fits of the same degradation models to the same data, but using different error models. Alternatively, a single mmkin object containing fits of several degradation models to the same data
...: Further arguments that will be passed to the nonlinear mixed-effects model fitting function.
backend: The backend to be used for fitting. Currently, only saemix is supported
algorithm: The algorithm to be used for fitting (currently not used)
no_random_effect: Default is NULL and will be passed to saem. If a character vector is supplied, it will be passed to all calls to saem, which will exclude random effects for all matching parameters. Alternatively, a list of character vectors or an object of class illparms.mhmkin can be specified. They have to have the same dimensions that the return object of the current call will have, i.e. the number of rows must match the number of degradation models in the mmkin object(s), and the number of columns must match the number of error models used in the mmkin object(s).
cores: The number of cores to be used for multicore processing. This is only used when the cluster argument is NULL. On Windows machines, cores > 1 is not supported, you need to use the cluster argument to use multiple logical processors. Per default, all cores detected by parallel::detectCores() are used, except on Windows where the default is 1.
cluster: A cluster as returned by makeCluster to be used for parallel execution.
x: An mhmkin object.
i: Row index selecting the fits for specific models
j: Column index selecting the fits to specific datasets
drop: If FALSE, the method always returns an mhmkin object, otherwise either a list of fit objects or a single fit object.

Author

Johannes Ranke

Examples

Run this code

if (FALSE) {
# We start with separate evaluations of all the first six datasets with two
# degradation models and two error models
f_sep_const <- mmkin(c("SFO", "FOMC"), ds_fomc[1:6], cores = 2, quiet = TRUE)
f_sep_tc <- update(f_sep_const, error_model = "tc")
# The mhmkin function sets up hierarchical degradation models aka
# nonlinear mixed-effects models for all four combinations, specifying
# uncorrelated random effects for all degradation parameters
f_saem_1 <- mhmkin(list(f_sep_const, f_sep_tc), cores = 2)
status(f_saem_1)
# The 'illparms' function shows that in all hierarchical fits, at least
# one random effect is ill-defined (the confidence interval for the
# random effect expressed as standard deviation includes zero)
illparms(f_saem_1)
# Therefore we repeat the fits, excluding the ill-defined random effects
f_saem_2 <- update(f_saem_1, no_random_effect = illparms(f_saem_1))
status(f_saem_2)
illparms(f_saem_2)
# Model comparisons show that FOMC with two-component error is preferable,
# and confirms our reduction of the default parameter model
anova(f_saem_1)
anova(f_saem_2)
# The convergence plot for the selected model looks fine
saemix::plot(f_saem_2[["FOMC", "tc"]]$so, plot.type = "convergence")
# The plot of predictions versus data shows that we have a pretty data-rich
# situation with homogeneous distribution of residuals, because we used the
# same degradation model, error model and parameter distribution model that
# was used in the data generation.
plot(f_saem_2[["FOMC", "tc"]])
# We can specify the same parameter model reductions manually
no_ranef <- list("parent_0", "log_beta", "parent_0", c("parent_0", "log_beta"))
dim(no_ranef) <- c(2, 2)
f_saem_2m <- update(f_saem_1, no_random_effect = no_ranef)
anova(f_saem_2m)
}