The direct evidence proportion gives the absolute contribution of
direct effect estimates combined for two-arm and multi-arm studies
to one network estimate.
Concerning indirectness, comparisons with a mean path length beyond
two should be interpreted with particular caution, as more than two
direct comparisons have to be combined serially on average.
Large indices of parallelism, either on study-level or on
aggregated level, can be considered as supporting the validity of a
network meta-analysis if there is only a small amount of
heterogeneity.
The network estimates for two treatments are linear combinations of
direct effect estimates comparing these or other treatments. The
linear coefficients can be seen as the generalization of weights
known from classical meta-analysis. These coefficients are given in
the projection matrix \(H\) of the underlying model. For
multi-arm studies, the coefficients depend on the choice of the
study-specific baseline treatment, but the absolute flow of
evidence can be made explicit for each design as shown in König et
al. (2013) and is given in H.tilde
.
All measures are calculated based on the common effects
meta-analysis by default. In the case that in function
netmeta
the argument random = TRUE
, all measures
are calculated for a random effects model. The value of the
square-root of the between-study variance \(\tau^2\) can also be
prespecified by argument tau.preset
in function
netmeta
.