smokingcessation

Network meta-analysis comparing the effects of a number of
interventions for smoking cessation.
These data are used as an example in Dias et al. (2013), page 651.

datasets

A comprehensive set of functions providing frequentist methods for network meta-analysis (Balduzzi et al., 2023) <doi:10.18637/jss.v106.i02> and supporting Schwarzer et al. (2015) <doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0>, Chapter 8 "Network Meta-Analysis":
- frequentist network meta-analysis following Rücker (2012) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1058>;
- additive network meta-analysis for combinations of treatments (Rücker et al., 2020) <doi:10.1002/bimj.201800167>;
- network meta-analysis of binary data using the Mantel-Haenszel or non-central hypergeometric distribution method (Efthimiou et al., 2019) <doi:10.1002/sim.8158>, or penalised logistic regression (Evrenoglou et al., 2022) <doi:10.1002/sim.9562>;
- rankograms and ranking of treatments by the Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) (Salanti et al., 2013) <doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016>;
- ranking of treatments using P-scores (frequentist analogue of SUCRAs without resampling) according to Rücker & Schwarzer (2015) <doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8>;
- split direct and indirect evidence to check consistency (Dias et al., 2010) <doi:10.1002/sim.3767>, (Efthimiou et al., 2019) <doi:10.1002/sim.8158>;
- league table with network meta-analysis results;
- 'comparison-adjusted' funnel plot (Chaimani & Salanti, 2012) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.57>;
- net heat plot and design-based decomposition of Cochran's Q according to Krahn et al. (2013) <doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-35>;
- measures characterizing the flow of evidence between two treatments by König et al. (2013) <doi:10.1002/sim.6001>;
- automated drawing of network graphs described in Rücker & Schwarzer (2016) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1143>;
- partial order of treatment rankings ('poset') and Hasse diagram for 'poset' (Carlsen & Bruggemann, 2014) <doi:10.1002/cem.2569>; (Rücker & Schwarzer, 2017) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1270>;
- contribution matrix as described in Papakonstantinou et al. (2018) <doi:10.12688/f1000research.14770.3> and Davies et al. (2022) <doi:10.1002/sim.9346>;
- network meta-regression with a single continuous or binary covariate;
- subgroup network meta-analysis.

Guido Schwarzer

netmeta

Network Meta-Analysis using Frequentist Methods

Gerta Rücker

Ulrike Krahn

Jochem König

Orestis Efthimiou

Annabel Davies

Theodoros Papakonstantinou

Theodoros Evrenoglou

Krzysztof Ciomek

Nana-Adjoa Kwarteng

smokingcessation function

A data frame with the following columns:<table class="table">
<tr><td>event1</td><td>number of individuals with successful
 smoking cessation in arm 1</td></tr>
<tr><td>n1</td><td>number of individuals in arm 1</td></tr>
<tr><td>event2</td><td>number of individuals with successful
 smoking cessation in arm 2</td></tr>
<tr><td>n2</td><td>number of individuals in arm 2</td></tr>
<tr><td>event3</td><td>number of individuals with successful
 smoking cessation in arm 3</td></tr>
<tr><td>n3</td><td>number of individuals in arm 3</td></tr>
<tr><td>treat1</td><td>treatment 1</td></tr>
<tr><td>treat2</td><td>treatment 2</td></tr>
<tr><td>treat3</td><td>treatment 3</td></tr>
</table>

Format

Network meta-analysis of interventions for smoking cessation — smokingcessation

A data frame with the following columns:<table class='table'>
<tr><td>event1</td><td>number of individuals with successful
 smoking cessation in arm 1</td></tr>
<tr><td>n1</td><td>number of individuals in arm 1</td></tr>
<tr><td>event2</td><td>number of individuals with successful
 smoking cessation in arm 2</td></tr>
<tr><td>n2</td><td>number of individuals in arm 2</td></tr>
<tr><td>event3</td><td>number of individuals with successful
 smoking cessation in arm 3</td></tr>
<tr><td>n3</td><td>number of individuals in arm 3</td></tr>
<tr><td>treat1</td><td>treatment 1</td></tr>
<tr><td>treat2</td><td>treatment 2</td></tr>
<tr><td>treat3</td><td>treatment 3</td></tr>
</table>

Network meta-analysis of interventions for smoking cessation

smokingcessation: Network meta-analysis of interventions for smoking cessation

Description

Arguments

Format

See Also

Examples

*event1*	number of individuals with successful smoking cessation in arm 1
n1	number of individuals in arm 1
*event2*	number of individuals with successful smoking cessation in arm 2
n2	number of individuals in arm 2
*event3*	number of individuals with successful smoking cessation in arm 3
n3	number of individuals in arm 3
*treat1*	treatment 1
*treat2*	treatment 2
*treat3*	treatment 3