Dyads are capable of having multiple disputes in a given year,
which can create a problem for merging into a complete dyad-year
data frame. Consider the case of France and Italy in 1860, which
had three separate dispute onsets that year (MID#0112, MID#0113, MID#0306),
as illustrative of the problem. The default process in peacesciencer
employs several rules to whittle down these duplicate dyad-years for
merging into a dyad-year data frame. These are available in
add_cow_mids()
and add_gml_mids()
.
This really should be the absolute last exclusion rules a researcher uses.
It's a "nuclear option", if you will. Assuming you've run other case
exclusion rules to isolate onsets and severe disputes, what remains
at the end should be duplicates that are functionally equivalent
observations. Your data cannot have duplicates, and these remaining
observations are basically the same. Therefore, just drop something.
wc_jds()
is a simple, less wordy, shortcut for the same function.