Dyads are capable of having multiple disputes in a given year,
which can create a problem for merging into a complete dyad-year
data frame. Consider the case of France and Italy in 1860, which
had three separate dispute onsets that year (MID#0112, MID#0113, MID#0306),
as illustrative of the problem. The default process in peacesciencer
employs several rules to whittle down these duplicate dyad-years for
merging into a dyad-year data frame. These are available in
add_cow_mids()
and add_gml_mids()
.
This really should be one of the last exclusion rules a researcher uses.
There is no substantive reason to assume the lower start month matters
for the cause of isolating "serious" or "severe" disputes in the presence
of duplicates. It's really just a way of isolating which duplicated
observation happened first where remaining duplicates are otherwise
very similar to each other.
wc_stmon()
is a simple, less wordy, shortcut for the same function.