Learn R Programming

performance (version 0.12.4)

check_outliers: Outliers detection (check for influential observations)

Description

Checks for and locates influential observations (i.e., "outliers") via several distance and/or clustering methods. If several methods are selected, the returned "Outlier" vector will be a composite outlier score, made of the average of the binary (0 or 1) results of each method. It represents the probability of each observation of being classified as an outlier by at least one method. The decision rule used by default is to classify as outliers observations which composite outlier score is superior or equal to 0.5 (i.e., that were classified as outliers by at least half of the methods). See the Details section below for a description of the methods.

Usage

check_outliers(x, ...)

# S3 method for default check_outliers( x, method = c("cook", "pareto"), threshold = NULL, ID = NULL, verbose = TRUE, ... )

# S3 method for numeric check_outliers(x, method = "zscore_robust", threshold = NULL, ...)

# S3 method for data.frame check_outliers(x, method = "mahalanobis", threshold = NULL, ID = NULL, ...)

# S3 method for performance_simres check_outliers( x, type = "default", iterations = 100, alternative = "two.sided", ... )

Value

A logical vector of the detected outliers with a nice printing method: a check (message) on whether outliers were detected or not. The information on the distance measure and whether or not an observation is considered as outlier can be recovered with the as.data.frame

function. Note that the function will (silently) return a vector of FALSE

for non-supported data types such as character strings.

Arguments

x

A model, a data.frame, a performance_simres simulate_residuals() or a DHARMa object.

...

When method = "ics", further arguments in ... are passed down to ICSOutlier::ics.outlier(). When method = "mahalanobis", they are passed down to stats::mahalanobis(). percentage_central can be specified when method = "mcd". For objects of class performance_simres or DHARMa, further arguments are passed down to DHARMa::testOutliers().

method

The outlier detection method(s). Can be "all" or some of "cook", "pareto", "zscore", "zscore_robust", "iqr", "ci", "eti", "hdi", "bci", "mahalanobis", "mahalanobis_robust", "mcd", "ics", "optics" or "lof".

threshold

A list containing the threshold values for each method (e.g. list('mahalanobis' = 7, 'cook' = 1)), above which an observation is considered as outlier. If NULL, default values will be used (see 'Details'). If a numeric value is given, it will be used as the threshold for any of the method run.

ID

Optional, to report an ID column along with the row number.

verbose

Toggle warnings.

type

Type of method to test for outliers. Can be one of "default", "binomial" or "bootstrap". Only applies when x is an object returned by simulate_residuals() or of class DHARMa. See 'Details' in ?DHARMa::testOutliers for a detailed description of the types.

iterations

Number of simulations to run.

alternative

A character string specifying the alternative hypothesis.

Model-specific methods

  • Cook's Distance: Among outlier detection methods, Cook's distance and leverage are less common than the basic Mahalanobis distance, but still used. Cook's distance estimates the variations in regression coefficients after removing each observation, one by one (Cook, 1977). Since Cook's distance is in the metric of an F distribution with p and n-p degrees of freedom, the median point of the quantile distribution can be used as a cut-off (Bollen, 1985). A common approximation or heuristic is to use 4 divided by the numbers of observations, which usually corresponds to a lower threshold (i.e., more outliers are detected). This only works for frequentist models. For Bayesian models, see pareto.

  • Pareto: The reliability and approximate convergence of Bayesian models can be assessed using the estimates for the shape parameter k of the generalized Pareto distribution. If the estimated tail shape parameter k exceeds 0.5, the user should be warned, although in practice the authors of the loo package observed good performance for values of k up to 0.7 (the default threshold used by performance).

Univariate methods

  • Z-scores ("zscore", "zscore_robust"): The Z-score, or standard score, is a way of describing a data point as deviance from a central value, in terms of standard deviations from the mean ("zscore") or, as it is here the case ("zscore_robust") by default (Iglewicz, 1993), in terms of Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) from the median (which are robust measures of dispersion and centrality). The default threshold to classify outliers is 1.959 (threshold = list("zscore" = 1.959)), corresponding to the 2.5% (qnorm(0.975)) most extreme observations (assuming the data is normally distributed). Importantly, the Z-score method is univariate: it is computed column by column. If a data frame is passed, the Z-score is calculated for each variable separately, and the maximum (absolute) Z-score is kept for each observations. Thus, all observations that are extreme on at least one variable might be detected as outliers. Thus, this method is not suited for high dimensional data (with many columns), returning too liberal results (detecting many outliers).

  • IQR ("iqr"): Using the IQR (interquartile range) is a robust method developed by John Tukey, which often appears in box-and-whisker plots (e.g., in ggplot2::geom_boxplot). The interquartile range is the range between the first and the third quartiles. Tukey considered as outliers any data point that fell outside of either 1.5 times (the default threshold is 1.7) the IQR below the first or above the third quartile. Similar to the Z-score method, this is a univariate method for outliers detection, returning outliers detected for at least one column, and might thus not be suited to high dimensional data. The distance score for the IQR is the absolute deviation from the median of the upper and lower IQR thresholds. Then, this value is divided by the IQR threshold, to “standardize” it and facilitate interpretation.

  • CI ("ci", "eti", "hdi", "bci"): Another univariate method is to compute, for each variable, some sort of "confidence" interval and consider as outliers values lying beyond the edges of that interval. By default, "ci" computes the Equal-Tailed Interval ("eti"), but other types of intervals are available, such as Highest Density Interval ("hdi") or the Bias Corrected and Accelerated Interval ("bci"). The default threshold is 0.95, considering as outliers all observations that are outside the 95% CI on any of the variable. See bayestestR::ci() for more details about the intervals. The distance score for the CI methods is the absolute deviation from the median of the upper and lower CI thresholds. Then, this value is divided by the difference between the upper and lower CI bounds divided by two, to “standardize” it and facilitate interpretation.

Multivariate methods

  • Mahalanobis Distance: Mahalanobis distance (Mahalanobis, 1930) is often used for multivariate outliers detection as this distance takes into account the shape of the observations. The default threshold is often arbitrarily set to some deviation (in terms of SD or MAD) from the mean (or median) of the Mahalanobis distance. However, as the Mahalanobis distance can be approximated by a Chi squared distribution (Rousseeuw and Van Zomeren, 1990), we can use the alpha quantile of the chi-square distribution with k degrees of freedom (k being the number of columns). By default, the alpha threshold is set to 0.025 (corresponding to the 2.5\ Cabana, 2019). This criterion is a natural extension of the median plus or minus a coefficient times the MAD method (Leys et al., 2013).

  • Robust Mahalanobis Distance: A robust version of Mahalanobis distance using an Orthogonalized Gnanadesikan-Kettenring pairwise estimator (Gnanadesikan and Kettenring, 1972). Requires the bigutilsr package. See the bigutilsr::dist_ogk() function.

  • Minimum Covariance Determinant (MCD): Another robust version of Mahalanobis. Leys et al. (2018) argue that Mahalanobis Distance is not a robust way to determine outliers, as it uses the means and covariances of all the data - including the outliers - to determine individual difference scores. Minimum Covariance Determinant calculates the mean and covariance matrix based on the most central subset of the data (by default, 66\ is deemed to be a more robust method of identifying and removing outliers than regular Mahalanobis distance. This method has a percentage_central argument that allows specifying the breakdown point (0.75, the default, is recommended by Leys et al. 2018, but a commonly used alternative is 0.50).

  • Invariant Coordinate Selection (ICS): The outlier are detected using ICS, which by default uses an alpha threshold of 0.025 (corresponding to the 2.5\ value for outliers classification. Refer to the help-file of ICSOutlier::ics.outlier() to get more details about this procedure. Note that method = "ics" requires both ICS and ICSOutlier to be installed, and that it takes some time to compute the results. You can speed up computation time using parallel computing. Set the number of cores to use with options(mc.cores = 4) (for example).

  • OPTICS: The Ordering Points To Identify the Clustering Structure (OPTICS) algorithm (Ankerst et al., 1999) is using similar concepts to DBSCAN (an unsupervised clustering technique that can be used for outliers detection). The threshold argument is passed as minPts, which corresponds to the minimum size of a cluster. By default, this size is set at 2 times the number of columns (Sander et al., 1998). Compared to the other techniques, that will always detect several outliers (as these are usually defined as a percentage of extreme values), this algorithm functions in a different manner and won't always detect outliers. Note that method = "optics" requires the dbscan package to be installed, and that it takes some time to compute the results.

  • Local Outlier Factor: Based on a K nearest neighbors algorithm, LOF compares the local density of a point to the local densities of its neighbors instead of computing a distance from the center (Breunig et al., 2000). Points that have a substantially lower density than their neighbors are considered outliers. A LOF score of approximately 1 indicates that density around the point is comparable to its neighbors. Scores significantly larger than 1 indicate outliers. The default threshold of 0.025 will classify as outliers the observations located at qnorm(1-0.025) * SD) of the log-transformed LOF distance. Requires the dbscan package.

Methods for simulated residuals

The approach for detecting outliers based on simulated residuals differs from the traditional methods and may not be detecting outliers as expected. Literally, this approach compares observed to simulated values. However, we do not know the deviation of the observed data to the model expectation, and thus, the term "outlier" should be taken with a grain of salt. It refers to "simulation outliers". Basically, the comparison tests whether on observed data point is outside the simulated range. It is strongly recommended to read the related documentations in the DHARMa package, e.g. ?DHARMa::testOutliers.

Threshold specification

Default thresholds are currently specified as follows:

list(
  zscore = stats::qnorm(p = 1 - 0.001 / 2),
  zscore_robust = stats::qnorm(p = 1 - 0.001 / 2),
  iqr = 1.7,
  ci = 1 - 0.001,
  eti = 1 - 0.001,
  hdi = 1 - 0.001,
  bci = 1 - 0.001,
  cook = stats::qf(0.5, ncol(x), nrow(x) - ncol(x)),
  pareto = 0.7,
  mahalanobis = stats::qchisq(p = 1 - 0.001, df = ncol(x)),
  mahalanobis_robust = stats::qchisq(p = 1 - 0.001, df = ncol(x)),
  mcd = stats::qchisq(p = 1 - 0.001, df = ncol(x)),
  ics = 0.001,
  optics = 2 * ncol(x),
  lof = 0.001
)

Meta-analysis models

For meta-analysis models (e.g. objects of class rma from the metafor package or metagen from package meta), studies are defined as outliers when their confidence interval lies outside the confidence interval of the pooled effect.

Details

Outliers can be defined as particularly influential observations. Most methods rely on the computation of some distance metric, and the observations greater than a certain threshold are considered outliers. Importantly, outliers detection methods are meant to provide information to consider for the researcher, rather than to be an automatized procedure which mindless application is a substitute for thinking.

An example sentence for reporting the usage of the composite method could be:

"Based on a composite outlier score (see the 'check_outliers' function in the 'performance' R package; Lüdecke et al., 2021) obtained via the joint application of multiple outliers detection algorithms (Z-scores, Iglewicz, 1993; Interquartile range (IQR); Mahalanobis distance, Cabana, 2019; Robust Mahalanobis distance, Gnanadesikan and Kettenring, 1972; Minimum Covariance Determinant, Leys et al., 2018; Invariant Coordinate Selection, Archimbaud et al., 2018; OPTICS, Ankerst et al., 1999; Isolation Forest, Liu et al. 2008; and Local Outlier Factor, Breunig et al., 2000), we excluded n participants that were classified as outliers by at least half of the methods used."

References

  • Archimbaud, A., Nordhausen, K., and Ruiz-Gazen, A. (2018). ICS for multivariate outlier detection with application to quality control. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 128, 184-199. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.1016/j.csda.2018.06.011")

  • Gnanadesikan, R., and Kettenring, J. R. (1972). Robust estimates, residuals, and outlier detection with multiresponse data. Biometrics, 81-124.

  • Bollen, K. A., and Jackman, R. W. (1985). Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. Sociological Methods and Research, 13(4), 510-542.

  • Cabana, E., Lillo, R. E., and Laniado, H. (2019). Multivariate outlier detection based on a robust Mahalanobis distance with shrinkage estimators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02596.

  • Cook, R. D. (1977). Detection of influential observation in linear regression. Technometrics, 19(1), 15-18.

  • Iglewicz, B., and Hoaglin, D. C. (1993). How to detect and handle outliers (Vol. 16). Asq Press.

  • Leys, C., Klein, O., Dominicy, Y., and Ley, C. (2018). Detecting multivariate outliers: Use a robust variant of Mahalanobis distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 150-156.

  • Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., and Zhou, Z. H. (2008, December). Isolation forest. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 413-422). IEEE.

  • Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., and Makowski, D. (2021). performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.21105/joss.03139")

  • Thériault, R., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Lüdecke, D., Wiernik, B. M., and Makowski, D. (2023). Check your outliers! An introduction to identifying statistical outliers in R with easystats. Behavior Research Methods, 1-11. tools:::Rd_expr_doi("10.3758/s13428-024-02356-w")

  • Rousseeuw, P. J., and Van Zomeren, B. C. (1990). Unmasking multivariate outliers and leverage points. Journal of the American Statistical association, 85(411), 633-639.

See Also

see::plot.see_check_outliers() for options to customize the plot.

Other functions to check model assumptions and and assess model quality: check_autocorrelation(), check_collinearity(), check_convergence(), check_heteroscedasticity(), check_homogeneity(), check_model(), check_overdispersion(), check_predictions(), check_singularity(), check_zeroinflation()