Learn R Programming

performanceEstimation (version 1.1.0)

classificationMetrics: Calculate some standard classification evaluation metrics of predictive performance

Description

This function is able to calculate a series of classification evaluation statistics given two vectors: one with the true target variable values, and the other with the predicted target variable values. Some of the metrics may require additional information to be given (see Details section).

Usage

classificationMetrics(trues,preds, metrics=NULL, benMtrx=NULL, allCls=unique(c(levels(as.factor(trues)),levels(as.factor(preds)))), posClass=allCls[1], beta=1)

Arguments

trues
A vector or factor with the true values of the target variable.
preds
A vector or factor with the predicted values of the target variable.
metrics
A vector with the names of the evaluation statistics to calculate (see Details section). If none is indicated (default) it will calculate all available metrics.
benMtrx
An optional cost/benefit matrix with numeric values representing the benefits (positive values) and costs (negative values) for all combinations of predicted and true values of the nominal target variable of the task. In this context, the matrix should have the dimensions C x C, where C is the number of possible class values of the classification task. Benefits (positive values) should be on the diagonal of the matrix (situations where the true and predicted values are equal, i.e. the model predicted the correct class and thus should be rewarded for that), whilst costs (negative values) should be on all positions outside of the diagonal of the matrix (situations where the predicted value is different from the true class value and thus the model should incur on a cost for this wrong prediction). The function assumes the rows of the matrix are the predicted values while the columns are the true class values.
allCls
An optional vector with the possible values of the nominal target variable, i.e. a vector with the classes of the problem. The default of this parameter is to infer these values from the given vector of true and predicted values values. However, if these are small vectors (e.g. you are evaluating your model on a small test set), it may happen that not all possible class values occur in this vector and this will potentially create problems in the sub-sequent calculations. Moreover, even if the vector is not small, for highly unbalanced classification tasks, this problem may still occur. In these contexts, it is safer to specifically indicate the possible class values through this parameter.
posClass
An optional string with the name of the class (a value of the target nominal variable) that should be considered the "positive" class. This is used typically on two class problems where one of the classes is more relevant than the other (the positive class). It will default to the first value of the vector of possible classes (allCls).
beta
An optional number for the value of the Beta parameter in the calulation of the F-measure (defaults to 1 that corresponds to giving equal relevance to precision and recall in the calculation of the F score).

Value

A named vector with the calculated statistics.

Details

In the following description of the currently available metrics we denote the vector of true target variable values as t, the vector of predictions by p, while n denotes the size of these two vectors, i.e. the number of test cases. Furthermore we will denote the number of classes (different values of the target nominal variable) as C. For problems with only two classes, where one is considered the "positive" class we will use some extra notation, namely: TP = #p == + & t == + ; FP = #p == + & t == - ; TN = #p == - & t == -; FN = #p == - & t == + ; P = #t == + ; N = #t == -; Finally, for some descriptions we will use the concept of confusion matrix (CM). This is a C x C square matrix where entry CM[i,j] contains the number of times (for a certain test set) some model predicted class i for a true class value of j, i.e. rows of this matrix represent predicted values and columns true values. We will also refer to cost/benefit matrices (or utility matrices) that have the same structure (squared C x C) where entry CB[i,j] represents the cost/benefit of predicting a class i for a true class of j.

The currently available classification performance metrics are: "acc": sum(I(t_i == p_i))/n, where I() is an indicator function given 1 if its argument is true and 0 otherwise. Note that "acc" is a value in the interval [0,1], 1 corresponding to all predictions being correct.

"err": the error rate, calculated as 1 - "acc"

"totU": this is a metric that takes into consideration not only the fact that the predictions are correct or not, but also the costs or benefits of these predictions. As mentioned above it assumes that the user provides a fully specified cost/benefit matrix though parameter benMtrx, with benefits corresponding to correct predictions, i.e. where t_i == p_i, while costs correspond to erroneous predictions. These matrices are C x C square matrices, where C is the number of possible values of the nominal target variable (i.e. the number of classes). The entry benMtrx[x, y] represents the utility (a cost if x != y) of the model predicting x for a true value of y. The diagonal of these matrices corresponds to the correct predictions (t_i == p_i) and should have positive values (benefits). The positions outside of the diagonal correspond to prediction errors and should have negative values (costs). The "totU" measures the total Utility (sum of the costs and benefits) of the predictions of a classification model. It is calculated as sum(CB[p_i,t_j] * CM[p_i,t_j) where CB is a cost/benefit matrix and CM is a confusion matrix.

"fpr": false positives rate, is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that measures the proportion of times the model forecasted a positive class when it should not and it is given by FP/N

"fnr": false negatives rate, is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that measures the proportion of times the model forecasted a negative class when it should not, and it is given by FN/P

"tpr": true positives rate, is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that measures the proportion of times the model forecasted a positive class for the positive test cases, and it is given by TP/P

"tnr": true negatives rate, is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that measures the proportion of times the model forecasted a negative class for the negative test cases, and it is given by TN/N

"rec": recall, it is equal to the true positive rate ("tpr")

"sens": sensitivity, it is equal to the true positive rate ("tpr")

"spec": specificity, it is equal to the true negative rate ("tnr")

"prec": precision, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that measures the proportion of times the model forecasted a positive class and it was correct, and it is given by TP/(TP+FP)

"ppv": predicted positive value, it is equal to the precision ("prec")

"fdr": false discovery rate, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that is given by FP/(TP+FP)

"npv": negative predicted value, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that is given by TN/(TN+FN)

"for": false omission rate, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that is given by FN/(TN+FN)

"plr": positive likelihood ratio, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that is given by "tpr"/"fpr" "nlr": negative likelihood ratio, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that is given by "fnr"/"tnr" "dor": diagnostic odds ratio, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that is given by "plr"/"nlr" "rpp": rate of positive predictions, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that measures the proportion of times the model forecasted a positive class, and it is given by (TP+FP)/N

"lift": lift, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks and it is given by TP/P/(TP+FP) or equivalently TP/(P*TP+P*FP)

"F": the F-nmeasure, it is a metric applicable to two classes tasks that considers both the values of precision and recall weighed by a parameter Beta (defaults to 1 corresponding to equal weights to both), and it is given by (1+Beta^2)*("prec" * "rec") / ( (Beta^2 * "prec") + "rec")

"microF": micro-averaged F-measure, it is equal to accuracy ("acc")

"macroF": macro-averaged F-measure, it is the average of the F-measure scores calculated by making the positive class each of the possible class values in turn

"macroRec": macro-averaged recall, it is the average recall by making the positive class each of the possible class values in turn

"macroPrec": macro-averaged precision, it is the average precision by making the positive class each of the possible class values in turn

References

Torgo, L. (2014) An Infra-Structure for Performance Estimation and Experimental Comparison of Predictive Models in R. arXiv:1412.0436 [cs.MS] http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.0436

See Also

regressionMetrics

Examples

Run this code
## Not run: 
# library(DMwR)
# ## Calculating several statistics of a classification tree on the Iris data
# data(iris)
# idx <- sample(1:nrow(iris),100)
# train <- iris[idx,]
# test <- iris[-idx,]
# tree <- rpartXse(Species ~ .,train)
# preds <- predict(tree,test,type='class')
# ## Calculate the  error rate
# classificationMetrics(test$Species,preds)
# ## Calculate the all possible error metrics
# classificationMetrics(test$Species,preds)
# ## Now trying calculating the utility of the predictions
# cbM <- matrix(c(10,-20,-20,-20,20,-10,-20,-10,20),3,3)
# classificationMetrics(test$Species,preds,"totU",cbM)
# ## End(Not run)

Run the code above in your browser using DataLab