prefmod (version 0.8-33)

patt.design: Paired Comparison Patterns - Design Matrix Generation

Description

The function patt.design converts (i) real paired comparison responses, or (ii) a set of ratings (or Likert type responses measured on a commmon scale), or (iii) full rankings into paired comparison patterns, returning a new data frame containing the design matrix for a loglinear paired comparison model. Additionally, the frequencies of these patterns are computed and are stored in the first column of the data frame.

Usage

patt.design(obj, nitems = NULL, objnames = "", objcovs = NULL,
            cat.scovs = NULL, num.scovs=NULL, resptype = "paircomp",
            reverse = FALSE, ia = FALSE, casewise = FALSE, ...)

Arguments

obj

either a data frame or a data file name.

nitems

number of items (objects). nitems is not the number of comparisons!

objnames

an optional character vector with names for the objects These names are the columns names in the ouput data frame. If objnames is not specified o1,o2, etc. will be used.

objcovs

an optional data frame with object specific covariates. The rows correspond to the objects, the columns define the covariates. The column names of this data frame are later used to fit the covariates. Factors are not allowed. In th

cat.scovs

a character vector with the names of the categorical subject covariates in the data file to be included into the design matrix. (example: cat.scovs = c("SEX", "WORK")). If all covariates in the data are cat

num.scovs

analogous to cat.scovs for numerical (continuous) subject covariates. If any numerical covariates are specified, casewise is set to TRUE.

resptype

one of "paircomp", "rating", or "ranking".

reverse

If the responses are such that low values correspond to high preference (or agreement or rank) and high values to low preference (or agreement or ranks) (e.g., (1) I strongly agree ...(5) I strongly disagree) the

ia

generates covariates for interactions between comparisons if ia = TRUE.

casewise

If casewise = TRUE a separate design structure is set up for each subject in the data. This is required when fitting continuous subject covariates. However, the design can become very large in the case of many subjects

...

deprecated options to allow for backwards compatibility (see Deprecated below)

Value

• The output is a dataframe. Each row represents a unique response pattern. If subject covariates are specified, each row instead represents a particular combination of a unique covariate combination with a response pattern. All possible combinations are generated. The first column contains the counts for the paired comparison response patterns and is labelled with Y. The next columns are the covariates for the items and the undecided category effects (one for each comparison). These are labelled as u12,u13, etc., where 12 denotes the comparison between items 1 and 2. Optionally, covariates for dependencies between comparisons follow. The columns are labelled Ia.bc denoting the interaction of the comparisons between items (a,b) and (a,c) where the common item is a. If subject covariates are present they are in the rightmost columns and defined to be factors.

encoding

UTF-8

Input Data

Responses have to be coded as consecutive integers (e.g., (0,1), or (1,2,3,...), where the smallest value corresponds to (highest) preference for the first object in a comparison. For (ordinal) paired comparison data (resptype = "paircomp") the codings (1,-1), (2,1,-1,-2), (1,0,-1), (2,1,0,-1,-2) etc. can also be used. Then negative numbers correspond to not preferred, 0 to undecided. Missing responses are not allowed (use functions pattPC.fit, pattL.fit, or pattR.fit instead). Input data (via the first argument obj in the function call) is specified either through a dataframe or a datafile in which case obj is a path/filename. The input data file if specified must be a plain text file with variable names in the first row as readable via the command read.table(datafilename, header = TRUE). The leftmost columns must be the responses to the paired comparisons, ratings (Likert items), or rankings. For paired comparisons the mandatory order is of comparisons is (12) (13) (23) (14) (24) (34) (15) (25) etc. For rankings, the lowest value means highest rank according to the underlying scale. Each column in the data file corresponds to one of the ranked objects. For example, if we have 3 objects denoted by A,B,and C, with corresponding columns in the data matrix, the response pattern (3,1,2) represents: object B ranked highest, C ranked second, and A ranked lowest. For ratings. again the lowest value means highest endorsement (agreement) according to the underlying scale. All items are assumed to have the same number of response cateory The columns for responses are optionally followed by columns for subject covariates. If categorical, they have to be specified such that the categories are represented by consecutive integers starting with 1. Missing values are not allowed and treated such that rows with NAs are removed from the resulting design structure and a message is printed. For an example see xmpl. (Besides supplying data via a dataframe or a datafile name, obj can also be specified as a control list with the same elements as the arguments in the function call. The data must then be specified as a path/filename using the element datafile = "filename". The control list feature is deprecated. An example is given below.)

Details

The function patt.design allows for different scenarios mainly concerning

• responses.Currently, three types of responses can be specified.
  • paired comparison data.Responses can be either simplypreferred--not preferredor ordinal (strongly preferred--...--not at all preferred). In both cases an undecided category may or may not occur. If there are more than three categories a they are reduced to two or three response categories. The set of paired comparison responses represents a response pattern.
  • ratings/Likert type responses.The responses to Likert type items are transformed to paired comparison responses by calculating the difference between each pair of the Likert items. This leads to an ordinal (adjacent categories) paired comparison model with 2$k$-1 response categories where$k$is the number of the (original) Likert categories. Again, the transformed ratings are reduced to three response categories (preferred--undecided--not preferred).
  • rankings.Currently only full rankings are allowed, i.e., a (consecutive) integer must uniquely be assigned to each object in a list according to the (subjective) ordering. Ties are not allowed. As for ratings, the rankings are transformed to paired comparison responses by calculating the difference between each pair of the ranks. Again a category reduction (as described above) is automatically performed.
• comparison covariates.The design matrix for the basic model has columns for the items (objects) and (depending on the type of responses) for undecided comparisons. For ratings (Likert type) undecided comparisons occur if any subject has responded to two items in the same category. For paired comparisons it depends on the design. For rankings there are no undecided categories. If undecided categories occur there is one dummy variable for each comparison. Additionally, covariates for two way interaction between comparisons (i.e., for effects resulting from the dependence between two comparisons that have one item in common) can be obtained by settingia = TRUE.
• object specific covariates.For modelling certain characteristics of objects a reparameterisation can be included in the design. This is sometimes called conjoint analysis. The object specific covariates can be continuous or dummy variables. For the specification see Argumentobjcovsabove.
• subject covariates.For modelling different preference scales for the items according to characteristics of the respondents categorical subject covariates can be included in the design. The corresponding variables are defined as numerical vectors where the levels are specified with consecutive integers starting with 1. This format must be used in the input data file and is also used in all outputs.

References

Dittrich, R., Francis, B.J., Hatzinger R., Katzenbeisser, W. (2007), A Paired Comparison Approach for the Analysis of Sets of Likert Scale Responses. Statistical Modelling, Vol. 7, No. 1, 3-28.

See Also

llbt.design, pattPC.fit, pattL.fit, pattR.fit

Examples

# mini example with three Likert items and two subject covariates
dsgnmat <- patt.design(xmpl, nitems = 3, resptype = "rating",
      ia = TRUE, cov.sel = "ALL")
head(dsgnmat)


# ILLUSTRATING THE ISSP2000 EXAMPLE
# simplified version of the analysis as given in Dittrich et. al (2007).
design <- patt.design(issp2000, nitems = 6, resptype = "rating",
      cov.sel = c("SEX", "EDU"))


# - fit null multinomial model (basic model for items without subject
#     covariates) through Poisson distribution.
# - SEX:EDU parameters are nuisance parameters
# - the last item (GENE) becomes a reference item in the model and is aliased;
#     all other items are compared to this last item

# item parameters with undecided effects and no covariate effects.
summary(glm(y ~ SEX*EDU
  + CAR+IND+FARM+WATER+TEMP+GENE
  + u12+u13+u23+u14+u24+u34+u15+u25+u35+u45+u16+u26+u36+u46+u56,
  data = design, family = poisson))

# now add main effect of SEX on items
summary(glm(y ~ SEX:EDU
  + CAR+IND+FARM+WATER+TEMP+GENE
  + (CAR+IND+FARM+WATER+TEMP+GENE):SEX
  + u12+u13+u23+u14+u24+u34+u15+u25+u35+u45+u16+u26+u36+u46+u56,
  data = design, family = poisson))