mediate: Estimate and display direct and indirect effects of mediators and moderator in path models

Description

Find the direct and indirect effects of a predictor in path models of mediation and moderation. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the indirect effects. Mediation models are just extended regression models making explicit the effect of particular covariates in the model. Moderation is done by multiplication of the predictor variables. This function supplies basic mediation/moderation analyses for some of the classic problem types.

Usage

mediate(y, x, m=NULL, data, mod = NULL, z = NULL, n.obs = NULL, use = "pairwise",
 n.iter = 5000,  alpha = 0.05, std = FALSE,plot=TRUE,zero=TRUE,part=FALSE, 
  main="Mediation")
mediate.diagram(medi,digits=2,ylim=c(3,7),xlim=c(-1,10),show.c=TRUE,
     main="Mediation model",cex=1,l.cex=1,...)
moderate.diagram(medi,digits=2,ylim=c(2,8),main="Moderation model", cex=1,l.cex=1,...)

Arguments

The dependent variable (or a formula suitable for a linear model), If a formula, then this is of the form y ~ x +(m) -z (see details)

One or more predictor variables

One (or more) mediating variables

data

A data frame holding the data or a correlation or covariance matrix.

mod

A moderating variable, if desired

Variables to partial out, if desired

n.obs

If the data are from a correlation or covariance matrix, how many observations were used. This will lead to simulated data for the bootstrap.

use

use="pairwise" is the default when finding correlations or covariances

n.iter

Number of bootstrap resamplings to conduct

alpha

Set the width of the confidence interval to be 1 - alpha

std

standardize the covariances to find the standardized betas

part

if part=TRUE, find part correlations otherwise find partial correlations when partialling

plot

Plot the resulting paths

zero

By default, will zero center the data before doing moderation

digits

The number of digits to report in the mediate.diagram.

medi

The output from mediate may be imported into mediate.diagram

ylim

The limits for the y axis in the mediate and moderate diagram functions

xlim

The limits for the x axis. Make the minimum more negative if the x by x correlations do not fit.

show.c

If FALSE, do not draw the c lines, just the partialed (c') lines

main

The title for the mediate and moderate functions

cex

Adjust the text size (defaults to 1)

l.cex

Adjust the text size in arrows, defaults to cex which in turn defaults to 1

...

Additional graphical parameters to pass to mediate.diagram

Value

total

The total direct effect of x on y (c)

direct

The beta effects of x (c') and m (b) on y

indirect

The indirect effect of x through m on y (c-ab)

mean.boot

mean bootstrapped value of indirect effect

sd.boot

Standard deviation of bootstrapped values

ci.quant

The upper and lower confidence intervals based upon the quantiles of the bootstrapped distribution.

boot

The bootstrapped values themselves.

The effect of x on m

The effect of m on y

b.int

The interaction of x and mod (if specified)

data

The original data plus the product term (if specified)

Details

When doing linear modeling, it is frequently convenient to estimate the direct effect of a predictor controlling for the indirect effect of a mediator. See Preacher and Hayes (2004) for a very thorough discussion of mediation. The mediate function will do some basic mediation and moderation models, with bootstrapped confidence intervals for the mediation/moderation effects.

Functionally, this is just regular linear regression and partial correlation with some different output.

In the case of two predictor variables, X and M, and a criterion variable Y, then the direct effect of X on Y, labeled with the path c, is said to be mediated by the effect of x on M (path a) and the effect of M on Y (path b). This partial effect (a b) is said to mediate the direct effect of X --c--> Y: X --a -> M --b--> Y with X --c'--> Y where c' = c - ab.

Testing the significance of the ab mediation effect is done through bootstrapping many random resamples (with replacement) of the data.

For moderation, the moderation effect of Z on the relationship between X -> Y is found by taking the (centered) product of X and Z and then adding this XZ term into the regression. By default, the data are zero centered before doing moderation (product terms). This is following the advice of Cohen, Cohen, West and Aiken (2003). However, to agree with the analyses reported in Hayes (2013) we can set the zero=FALSE option to not zero center the data.

To partial out variables, either define them in the z term, or express as negative entries in the formula mode:

y1 ~ x1 + x2 + (m1)+ (m2) -z will look for the effect of x1 and x2 on y, mediated through m1 and m2 after z is partialled out.

Moderated mediation is done by specifying a product term.

y1 ~ x1 + x2*x3 + (m1)+ (m2) -z will look for the effect of x1, x2, x3 and the product of x2 and x3 on y, mediated through m1 and m2 after z is partialled out.

In the case of being provided just a correlation matrix, the bootstrapped values are based upon bootstrapping from data matching the original covariance/correlation matrix with the addition of normal errors. This allows us to test the mediation/moderation effect even if not given raw data. Moderation can not be done with just correlation matrix.

The function has been tested against some of the basic cases and examples in Hayes (2013) and the associated data sets.

Unless there is a temporal component that allows one to directly distinguish causal paths (time does not reverse direction), interpreting mediation models is problematic. Some people find it useful to compare the differences between mediation models where the causal paths (arrows) are reversed. This is a mistake and should not be done (Thoemmes, 2015).

For fine tuning the size of the graphic output, xlim and ylim can be specified in the mediate.diagram function. Otherwise, the graphics produced by mediate and moderate use the default xlim and ylim values.

Interaction terms (moderation) or mediated moderation can be specified as product terms.

References

J. Cohen, P. Cohen, S.G. West, and L.S. Aiken. (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 3rd ed edition.

Hayes, Andrew F. (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

Preacher, Kristopher J and Hayes, Andrew F (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, \& Computers 36, (4) 717-731.

Thoemmes, Felix (2015) Reversing arrows in mediation models does not distinguish plausible models. Basic and applied social psychology, 27: 226-234.

Data from Hayes (2013), Preacher and Hayes (2004), and from Kerchoff (1974).

The Tal_Or data set is from Nurit Tal-Or and Jonathan Cohen and Yariv Tsfati and Albert C. Gunther, (2010) ``Testing Causal Direction in the Influence of Presumed Media Influence", Communication Research, 37, 801-824 and is used with their kind permission. It is adapted from the webpage of A.F. Hayes. (www.afhayes.com/public/hayes2013data.zip).

The Garcia data set is from Garcia, Donna M. and Schmitt, Michael T. and Branscombe, Nyla R. and Ellemers, Naomi (2010). Women's reactions to ingroup members who protest discriminatory treatment: The importance of beliefs about inequality and response appropriateness. European Journal of Social Psychology, (40) 733-745 and is used with their kind permission. It was downloaded from the Hayes (2013) website.

For an example of how to display the sexism by protest interaction, see the examples in the GSBE (Garcia) data set.

See the ``how to do mediation and moderation" at personality-project.org/r/psych/HowTo/mediation.pdf as well as the introductory vignette.

Examples

Run this code

# NOT RUN {
# A simple mediation example is the Tal_Or data set (pmi for Hayes)
#The pmi data set from Hayes is available as the Tal_Or data set. 
mod4 <- mediate(reaction ~ cond + (pmi), data =Tal_Or,n.iter=50) 
summary(mod4)
#Two mediators (from Hayes model 6 (chapter 5))
mod6 <- mediate(reaction ~ cond + (pmi) + (import), data =Tal_Or,n.iter=50) 
summary(mod6)

#Moderated mediation is done for the Garcia (Garcia, 2010) data set.
# (see Hayes, 2013 for the protest data set
#n.iter set to 50 (instead of default of 5000) for speed of example
#no mediation, just an interaction
mod7 <- mediate(liking ~  sexism * prot2 , data=Garcia, n.iter = 50)
summary(mod7)
data(GSBE)   #The Garcia et al data set (aka GSBE)
mod11.4 <- mediate(liking ~  sexism * prot2 + (respappr), data=Garcia,
        n.iter = 50,zero=FALSE)   #to match Hayes
summary(mod11.4)
#to see this interaction graphically, run the examples in ?Garcia


#data from Preacher and Hayes (2004)
sobel <- structure(list(SATIS = c(-0.59, 1.3, 0.02, 0.01, 0.79, -0.35, 
-0.03, 1.75, -0.8, -1.2, -1.27, 0.7, -1.59, 0.68, -0.39, 1.33, 
-1.59, 1.34, 0.1, 0.05, 0.66, 0.56, 0.85, 0.88, 0.14, -0.72, 
0.84, -1.13, -0.13, 0.2), THERAPY = structure(c(0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 
1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 
1, 1, 1, 0), value.labels = structure(c(1, 0), .Names = c("cognitive", 
"standard"))), ATTRIB = c(-1.17, 0.04, 0.58, -0.23, 0.62, -0.26, 
-0.28, 0.52, 0.34, -0.09, -1.09, 1.05, -1.84, -0.95, 0.15, 0.07, 
-0.1, 2.35, 0.75, 0.49, 0.67, 1.21, 0.31, 1.97, -0.94, 0.11, 
-0.54, -0.23, 0.05, -1.07)), .Names = c("SATIS", "THERAPY", "ATTRIB"
), row.names = c(NA, -30L), class = "data.frame", variable.labels = structure(c("Satisfaction", 
"Therapy", "Attributional Positivity"), .Names = c("SATIS", "THERAPY", 
"ATTRIB")))
 #n.iter set to 50 (instead of default of 5000) for speed of example

#There are several forms of input.  The original specified y, x , and the mediator 
#mediate(1,2,3,sobel,n.iter=50)  #The example in Preacher and Hayes
#As of October, 2017 we can specify this in a formula mode
mediate (SATIS ~ THERAPY + (ATTRIB),data=sobel, n.iter=50) #specify the mediator by 
# adding parentheses

#A.C. Kerchoff, (1974) Ambition and Attainment: A Study of Four Samples of American Boys.
#Data from sem package taken from Kerckhoff (and in turn, from Lisrel manual)
R.kerch <- structure(list(Intelligence = c(1, -0.1, 0.277, 0.25, 0.572, 
0.489, 0.335), Siblings = c(-0.1, 1, -0.152, -0.108, -0.105, 
-0.213, -0.153), FatherEd = c(0.277, -0.152, 1, 0.611, 0.294, 
0.446, 0.303), FatherOcc = c(0.25, -0.108, 0.611, 1, 0.248, 0.41, 
0.331), Grades = c(0.572, -0.105, 0.294, 0.248, 1, 0.597, 0.478
), EducExp = c(0.489, -0.213, 0.446, 0.41, 0.597, 1, 0.651), 
    OccupAsp = c(0.335, -0.153, 0.303, 0.331, 0.478, 0.651, 1
    )), .Names = c("Intelligence", "Siblings", "FatherEd", "FatherOcc", 
"Grades", "EducExp", "OccupAsp"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c("Intelligence", 
"Siblings", "FatherEd", "FatherOcc", "Grades", "EducExp", "OccupAsp"
))

 #n.iter set to 50 (instead of default of 5000) for speed of demo
#mod.k <- mediate("OccupAsp","Intelligence",m= c(2:5),data=R.kerch,n.obs=767,n.iter=50)
#new style 
mod.k <- mediate(OccupAsp ~ Intelligence + (Siblings) + (FatherEd) + (FatherOcc) + 
(Grades), data = R.kerch, n.obs=767, n.iter=50)

mediate.diagram(mod.k) 
#print the path values 
mod.k

#Compare the following solution to the path coefficients found by the sem package

#mod.k2 <- mediate(y="OccupAsp",x=c("Intelligence","Siblings","FatherEd","FatherOcc"),
#     m= c(5:6),data=R.kerch,n.obs=767,n.iter=50)
#new format 
mod.k2 <- mediate(OccupAsp ~ Intelligence + Siblings + FatherEd + FatherOcc + (Grades) + 
(EducExp),data=R.kerch, n.obs=767, n.iter=50)
mediate.diagram(mod.k2,show.c=FALSE) #simpler output 
#print the path values
mod.k2

#Several interesting test cases are taken from analyses of the Spengler data set
#This is temporarily added to psych from psychTools to help build for CRAN
#Although the sample sizes are actually very large in the first wave,  I use the
#sample sizes from the last wave 
#We set the n.iter to be 50 instead of the default value of 5,000
 mod1 <- mediate(Income.50 ~ IQ + Parental+ (Ed.11) ,data=Spengler,
    n.obs = 1952, n.iter=50)
 mod2 <- mediate(Income.50 ~ IQ + Parental+ (Ed.11)  + (Income.11)
  ,data=Spengler,n.obs = 1952, n.iter=50)
 mod22 <-  mediate(Income.50 + Educ.50 ~ IQ + Parental+ (Ed.11)  + (Income.11) 
     ,data=Spengler,n.obs = 1952, n.iter=50)
#Now, compare these models
anova(mod1,mod2)

# }

Run the code above in your browser using DataLab