Given a matrix or data.frame of k keys for m items (-1, 0, 1), and a matrix or data.frame of items scores for m items and n people, find the sum scores or average scores for each person and each scale. In addition, report Cronbach's alpha, the average r, the scale intercorrelations, and the item by scale correlations. (Superseded by score.items).
score.alpha(keys, items, labels = NULL, totals=TRUE,digits = 2) #deprecated
Sum or average scores for each subject on the k scales
Cronbach's coefficient alpha. A simple (but non-optimal) measure of the internal consistency of a test. See also beta and omega.
The average correlation within a scale, also known as alpha 1 is a useful index of the internal consistency of a domain.
Number of items on each scale
The intercorrelation of all the scales
The correlation of each item with each scale. Because this is not corrected for item overlap, it will overestimate the amount that an item correlates with the other items in a scale.
A matrix or dataframe of -1, 0, or 1 weights for each item on each scale
Data frame or matrix of raw item scores
column names for the resulting scales
Find sum scores (default) or average score
Number of digits for answer (default =2)
William Revelle
This function has been replaced with scoreItems (for multiple scales) and alpha for single scales.
The process of finding sum or average scores for a set of scales given a larger set of items is a typical problem in psychometric research. Although the structure of scales can be determined from the item intercorrelations, to find scale means, variances, and do further analyses, it is typical to find the sum or the average scale score.
Various estimates of scale reliability include ``Cronbach's alpha", and the average interitem correlation. For k = number of items in a scale, and av.r = average correlation between items in the scale, alpha = k * av.r/(1+ (k-1)*av.r). Thus, alpha is an increasing function of test length as well as the test homeogeneity.
Alpha is a poor estimate of the general factor saturation of a test (see Zinbarg et al., 2005) for it can seriously overestimate the size of a general factor, and a better but not perfect estimate of total test reliability because it underestimates total reliability. None the less, it is a useful statistic to report.
An introduction to psychometric theory with applications in R (in preparation). https://personality-project.org/r/book/
score.items, alpha, correct.cor, cluster.loadings, omega
y <- attitude #from the datasets package
keys <- matrix(c(rep(1,7),rep(1,4),rep(0,7),rep(-1,3)),ncol=3)
labels <- c("first","second","third")
x <- score.alpha(keys,y,labels) #deprecated
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab