Learn R Programming

spatstat (version 1.20-2)

Kinhom: Inhomogeneous K-function

Description

Estimates the inhomogeneous $K$ function of a non-stationary point pattern.

Usage

Kinhom(X, lambda=NULL, ..., r = NULL, breaks = NULL,
    correction=c("border", "bord.modif", "isotropic", "translate"),
    nlarge = 1000,
    lambda2=NULL, reciplambda=NULL, reciplambda2=NULL,
    sigma=NULL, varcov=NULL)

Arguments

X
The observed data point pattern, from which an estimate of the inhomogeneous $K$ function will be computed. An object of class "ppp" or in a format recognised by as.ppp()
lambda
Optional. Values of the estimated intensity function. Either a vector giving the intensity values at the points of the pattern X, a pixel image (object of class "im") giving the intensity values at all locatio
...
Extra arguments. Ignored if lambda is present. Passed to density.ppp if lambda is omitted.
r
vector of values for the argument $r$ at which the inhomogeneous $K$ function should be evaluated. Not normally given by the user; there is a sensible default.
breaks
An alternative to the argument r. Not normally invoked by the user. See Details.
correction
A character vector containing any selection of the options "border", "bord.modif", "isotropic", "Ripley", "translate", "none" or "best". It
nlarge
Optional. Efficiency threshold. If the number of points exceeds nlarge, then only the border correction will be computed, using a fast algorithm.
lambda2
Advanced use only. Matrix containing estimates of the products $\lambda(x_i)\lambda(x_j)$ of the intensities at each pair of data points $x_i$ and $x_j$.
reciplambda
Alternative to lambda. Values of the estimated reciprocal $1/\lambda$ of the intensity function. Either a vector giving the reciprocal intensity values at the points of the pattern X, a pixel image (o
reciplambda2
Advanced use only. Alternative to lambda2. A matrix giving values of the estimated reciprocal products $1/\lambda(x_i)\lambda(x_j)$ of the intensities at each pair of data points $x_i$ and $x_j$.
sigma,varcov
Optional arguments passed to density.ppp to control the smoothing bandwidth, when lambda is estimated by kernel smoothing.

Value

  • An object of class "fv" (see fv.object). Essentially a data frame containing at least the following columns,
  • rthe vector of values of the argument $r$ at which the pair correlation function $g(r)$ has been estimated
  • theovector of values of $\pi r^2$, the theoretical value of $K_{\rm inhom}(r)$ for an inhomogeneous Poisson process
  • and containing additional columns according to the choice specified in the correction argument. The additional columns are named border, trans and iso and give the estimated values of $K_{\rm inhom}(r)$ using the border correction, translation correction, and Ripley isotropic correction, respectively.

Details

This computes a generalisation of the $K$ function for inhomogeneous point patterns, proposed by Baddeley, Moller and Waagepetersen (2000). The ``ordinary'' $K$ function (variously known as the reduced second order moment function and Ripley's $K$ function), is described under Kest. It is defined only for stationary point processes. The inhomogeneous $K$ function $K_{\rm inhom}(r)$ is a direct generalisation to nonstationary point processes. Suppose $x$ is a point process with non-constant intensity $\lambda(u)$ at each location $u$. Define $K_{\rm inhom}(r)$ to be the expected value, given that $u$ is a point of $x$, of the sum of all terms $1/\lambda(u)\lambda(x_j)$ over all points $x_j$ in the process separated from $u$ by a distance less than $r$. This reduces to the ordinary $K$ function if $\lambda()$ is constant. If $x$ is an inhomogeneous Poisson process with intensity function $\lambda(u)$, then $K_{\rm inhom}(r) = \pi r^2$.

This allows us to inspect a point pattern for evidence of interpoint interactions after allowing for spatial inhomogeneity of the pattern. Values $K_{\rm inhom}(r) > \pi r^2$ are suggestive of clustering.

The argument lambda should supply the (estimated) values of the intensity function $\lambda$. It may be either [object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object] If lambda is a numeric vector, then its length should be equal to the number of points in the pattern X. The value lambda[i] is assumed to be the the (estimated) value of the intensity $\lambda(x_i)$ for the point $x_i$ of the pattern $X$. Each value must be a positive number; NA's are not allowed.

If lambda is a pixel image, the domain of the image should cover the entire window of the point pattern. If it does not (which may occur near the boundary because of discretisation error), then the missing pixel values will be obtained by applying a Gaussian blur to lambda using blur, then looking up the values of this blurred image for the missing locations. (A warning will be issued in this case.)

If lambda is a function, then it will be evaluated in the form lambda(x,y) where x and y are vectors of coordinates of the points of X. It should return a numeric vector with length equal to the number of points in X.

If lambda is omitted, then it will be estimated using a `leave-one-out' kernel smoother, as described in Baddeley, Moller and Waagepetersen (2000). The estimate lambda[i] for the point X[i] is computed by removing X[i] from the point pattern, applying kernel smoothing to the remaining points using density.ppp, and evaluating the smoothed intensity at the point X[i]. The smoothing kernel bandwidth is controlled by the arguments sigma and varcov, which are passed to density.ppp along with any extra arguments. Edge corrections are used to correct bias in the estimation of $K_{\rm inhom}$. Each edge-corrected estimate of $K_{\rm inhom}(r)$ is of the form $$\widehat K_{\rm inhom}(r) = \sum_i \sum_j \frac{1{d_{ij} \le r} e(x_i,x_j,r)}{\lambda(x_i)\lambda(x_j)}$$ where $d_{ij}$ is the distance between points $x_i$ and $x_j$, and $e(x_i,x_j,r)$ is an edge correction factor. For the `border' correction, $$e(x_i,x_j,r) = \frac{1(b_i > r)}{\sum_j 1(b_j > r)/\lambda(x_j)}$$ where $b_i$ is the distance from $x_i$ to the boundary of the window. For the `modified border' correction, $$e(x_i,x_j,r) = \frac{1(b_i > r)}{\mbox{area}(W \ominus r)}$$ where $W \ominus r$ is the eroded window obtained by trimming a margin of width $r$ from the border of the original window. For the `translation' correction, $$e(x_i,x_j,r) = \frac 1 {\mbox{area}(W \cap (W + (x_j - x_i)))}$$ and for the `isotropic' correction, $$e(x_i,x_j,r) = \frac 1 {\mbox{area}(W) g(x_i,x_j)}$$ where $g(x_i,x_j)$ is the fraction of the circumference of the circle with centre $x_i$ and radius $||x_i - x_j||$ which lies inside the window.

If the point pattern X contains more than about 1000 points, the isotropic and translation edge corrections can be computationally prohibitive. The computations for the border method are much faster, and are statistically efficient when there are large numbers of points. Accordingly, if the number of points in X exceeds the threshold nlarge, then only the border correction will be computed. Setting nlarge=Inf or correction="best" will prevent this from happening. Setting nlarge=0 is equivalent to selecting only the border correction with correction="border".

The pair correlation function can also be applied to the result of Kinhom; see pcf.

References

Baddeley, A., Moller, J. and Waagepetersen, R. (2000) Non- and semiparametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns. Statistica Neerlandica 54, 329--350.

See Also

Kest, pcf

Examples

Run this code
data(lansing)
  # inhomogeneous pattern of maples
  X <- unmark(split(lansing)$maple)
  <testonly>sub <- sample(c(TRUE,FALSE), X$n, replace=TRUE, prob=c(0.1,0.9))
     X <- X[sub]</testonly>

  # (1) intensity function estimated by model-fitting
  # Fit spatial trend: polynomial in x and y coordinates
  fit <- ppm(X, ~ polynom(x,y,2), Poisson())
  # (a) predict intensity values at points themselves,
  #     obtaining a vector of lambda values
  lambda <- predict(fit, locations=X, type="trend")
  # inhomogeneous K function
  Ki <- Kinhom(X, lambda)
  plot(Ki)
  # (b) predict intensity at all locations,
  #     obtaining a pixel image
  lambda <- predict(fit, type="trend")
  Ki <- Kinhom(X, lambda)
  plot(Ki)

  # (2) intensity function estimated by heavy smoothing
  Ki <- Kinhom(X, sigma=0.1)
  plot(Ki)

  # (3) simulated data: known intensity function
  lamfun <- function(x,y) { 50 + 100 * x }
  # inhomogeneous Poisson process
  Y <- rpoispp(lamfun, 150, owin())
  # inhomogeneous K function
  Ki <- Kinhom(Y, lamfun)
  plot(Ki)

  # How to make simulation envelopes:
  #      Example shows method (2)
  smo <- density.ppp(X, sigma=0.1)
  Ken <- envelope(X, Kinhom, nsim=99,
                  simulate=expression(rpoispp(smo)),
                  sigma=0.1, correction="trans")
  plot(Ken)

Run the code above in your browser using DataLab