rMaternII(kappa, r, win = owin(c(0,1),c(0,1)), stationary=TRUE)
"owin"
or something acceptable to as.owin
.stationary=TRUE
) or to generate the
proposal points only inside the window (stationary=FALSE
)."ppp"
).win
. The process is constructed by first
generating a uniform Poisson point process of ``proposal'' points
with intensity kappa
. If stationary = TRUE
(the
default), the proposal points are generated in a window larger than
win
that effectively means the proposals are stationary.
If stationary=FALSE
then the proposal points are
only generated inside the window win
.
Then each proposal point is marked by an ``arrival time'', a number
uniformly distributed in $[0,1]$ independently of other variables.
A proposal point is deleted if it lies within r
units' distance
of another proposal point that has an earlier arrival time.
Otherwise it is retained.
The retained points constitute Mat'ern's Model II.
The difference between Mat'ern's Model I and II is the italicised statement above. Model II has a higher intensity for the same parameter values.
rpoispp
,
rMatClust
,
rMaternI
X <- rMaternII(20, 0.05)
Y <- rMaternII(20, 0.05, stationary=FALSE)
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab