testit
This package provides two simple functions (30 lines of code in total):
assert(fact, ...)
: think of it asmessage(fact)
+stopifnot(...)
test_pkg(package)
: runs tests with all objects (exported or non-exported) in the package namespace directly available, so no need to use the triple-colonpackage:::name
for non-exported objects
Why?
Because it is tedious to type these commands repeatedly in tests:
message('checking if these numbers are equal...')
stopifnot(all.equal(1, 1+1e-10), 10*.1 == 1)
message('checking if a non-exported function works...')
stopifnot(is.character(package:::utility_foo(x = 'abcd', y = 1:100)))
With the two simple functions above, we type six letters (assert
) instead
of sixteen (message
+ stopifnot
), and assert
is also a more intuitive
function name for testing purposes (you assert a fact followed by evidence):
assert('These numbers are equal', {
(all.equal(1, 1 + 1e-10))
(10 * .1 == 1)
})
assert('A non-exported function works', {
res = utility_foo(x = 'abcd', y = 1:100)
(is.character(res))
})
assert('T is TRUE and F is FALSE by default, but can be changed', {
(T == TRUE )
(F == FALSE)
T = FALSE
(T == FALSE)
})
R CMD check
Put the tests under the directory pkg_name/tests/testit/
(where pkg_name
is the root directory of your package), and write a test-all.R
under
pkg_name/tests/
:
library(testit)
test_pkg('pkg_name')
That is all for R CMD check
. For package development, it is recommended to
use devtools. In
particular, Ctrl/Cmd + Shift + L
in RStudio makes all objects in a package
visible to you, and you can run tests interactively.
Installation
Stable version on CRAN:
install.packages('testit')
Development version:
devtools::install_github('yihui/testit')
More
How about testthat? Well,
this package is far less sophisticated than testthat. There is nothing
fancy in this package. Please do consider testthat if your tests require
more granularity. I myself do not use testthat because I'm too lazy to learn
the new vocabulary (testthat::expect_xxx
). For testit, I do not need to
think if I should use expect_equal
, expect_equivalent
, or
expect_identical
; I just write test conditions in parentheses that are expected to return TRUE
. That
is the only single rule to remember.
There is no plan to add new features or reinvent anything in this package. It is an intentionally tiny package.
Although he did not really mean it, Xunzi said something that happens to apply well to unit testing:
不积跬步,无以至千里;不积小流,无以成江海。
This package is free and open source software, licensed under GPL-3.