setarTest(x, m, d = 1, steps = d, series, thDelay = 0, nboot=10, trim=0.1, test=c("1vs", "2vs3"), hpc=c("none", "foreach"),check=FALSE)
TVECM.HStest
-The residual Sum of squares of model AR, 1 threshold TAR and 2 thresholds TAR (SSRs)
-The Ftest statistic for the test (Ftests)
-The bootstrap Pvalues (PvalBoot) and critical values (CriticalValBoot) for the test selected, and all Ftest computed (Ftestboot)
-The thresholds for the original series, obtained from search for 1 thresh (firstBests) and conditional search for 2 thresh (secBests)
-The number of bootstrap replications (nboot), the lags used (m) and the type of test (type)
$$F_{ij}=T( (S_{i}-S_{j})/S_{j} )$$
where $S_{i}$ is the SSR of the model with i regimes (and so i-1 thresholds).
Three test are avalaible. The both first can be seen as linearity test, whereas the third can be seen as a specification test: once the 1vs2 or/and 1vs3 rejected the linearity and henceforth accepted the presence of a threshold, is a model with one or two thresholds preferable?
Test 1vs2: Linear AR versus 1 threshold TAR
Test 1vs3: Linear AR versus 2 threshold2 TAR
Test 2vs3: 1 threshold TAR versus 2 threshold2 TAR
The both first are computed together and avalaible with test="1vs". The third test is avalaible with test="2vs3".
The homoskedastic bootstrap distribution is based on resampling the residuals from H0 model (ar for test 1vs, and setar(1) for test 2vs3), estimating the threshold parameter and then computing the Ftest, so it involves many computations and is pretty slow.
TVAR.LRtest
for the multivariate version. SETAR
for estimation of the model.#Data used by Hansen
sun<-(sqrt(sunspot.year+1)-1)*2
#Test 1vs2 and 1vs3
#setarTest(sun, m=11, thDelay=0:1, nboot=5,trim=0.1, test="1vs")
Run the code above in your browser using DataLab