is_stationary
INSTEAD! Check the stationary condition of specified GMAR, StMAR, or G-StMAR model.isStationary
checks the stationarity condition of the specified GMAR, StMAR, or G-StMAR model.
DEPRECATED, USE is_stationary
INSTEAD!
isStationary(
p,
M,
params,
model = c("GMAR", "StMAR", "G-StMAR"),
restricted = FALSE,
constraints = NULL
)
Returns TRUE
or FALSE
accordingly.
a positive integer specifying the autoregressive order of the model.
a positive integer specifying the number of mixture components.
a size (2x1) integer vector specifying the number of GMAR type components M1
in the
first element and StMAR type components M2
in the second element. The total number of mixture components is M=M1+M2
.
a real valued parameter vector specifying the model.
Size \((M(p+3)+M-M1-1x1)\) vector \(\theta\)\(=\)(\(\upsilon_{1}\)\(,...,\)\(\upsilon_{M}\), \(\alpha_{1},...,\alpha_{M-1},\)\(\nu\)) where
\(\upsilon_{m}\)\(=(\phi_{m,0},\)\(\phi_{m}\)\(,\)\(\sigma_{m}^2)\)
\(\phi_{m}\)\(=(\phi_{m,1},...,\phi_{m,p}), m=1,...,M\)
\(\nu\)\(=(\nu_{M1+1},...,\nu_{M})\)
\(M1\) is the number of GMAR type regimes.
In the GMAR model, \(M1=M\) and the parameter \(\nu\) dropped. In the StMAR model, \(M1=0\).
If the model imposes linear constraints on the autoregressive parameters:
Replace the vectors \(\phi_{m}\) with the vectors \(\psi_{m}\) that satisfy
\(\phi_{m}\)\(=\)\(C_{m}\psi_{m}\) (see the argument constraints
).
Size \((3M+M-M1+p-1x1)\) vector \(\theta\)\(=(\phi_{1,0},...,\phi_{M,0},\)\(\phi\)\(,\) \(\sigma_{1}^2,...,\sigma_{M}^2,\)\(\alpha_{1},...,\alpha_{M-1},\)\(\nu\)), where \(\phi\)=\((\phi_{1},...,\phi_{p})\) contains the AR coefficients, which are common for all regimes.
If the model imposes linear constraints on the autoregressive parameters:
Replace the vector \(\phi\) with the vector \(\psi\) that satisfies
\(\phi\)\(=\)\(C\psi\) (see the argument constraints
).
Symbol \(\phi\) denotes an AR coefficient, \(\sigma^2\) a variance, \(\alpha\) a mixing weight, and \(\nu\) a degrees of
freedom parameter. If parametrization=="mean"
, just replace each intercept term \(\phi_{m,0}\) with the regimewise mean
\(\mu_m = \phi_{m,0}/(1-\sum\phi_{i,m})\). In the G-StMAR model, the first M1
components are GMAR type
and the rest M2
components are StMAR type.
Note that in the case M=1, the mixing weight parameters \(\alpha\) are dropped, and in the case of StMAR or G-StMAR model,
the degrees of freedom parameters \(\nu\) have to be larger than \(2\).
is "GMAR", "StMAR", or "G-StMAR" model considered? In the G-StMAR model, the first M1
components
are GMAR type and the rest M2
components are StMAR type.
a logical argument stating whether the AR coefficients \(\phi_{m,1},...,\phi_{m,p}\) are restricted to be the same for all regimes.
specifies linear constraints imposed to each regime's autoregressive parameters separately.
a list of size \((pxq_{m})\) constraint matrices \(C_{m}\) of full column rank satisfying \(\phi_{m}\)\(=\)\(C_{m}\psi_{m}\) for all \(m=1,...,M\), where \(\phi_{m}\)\(=(\phi_{m,1},...,\phi_{m,p})\) and \(\psi_{m}\)\(=(\psi_{m,1},...,\psi_{m,q_{m}})\).
a size \((pxq)\) constraint matrix \(C\) of full column rank satisfying \(\phi\)\(=\)\(C\psi\), where \(\phi\)\(=(\phi_{1},...,\phi_{p})\) and \(\psi\)\(=\psi_{1},...,\psi_{q}\).
The symbol \(\phi\) denotes an AR coefficient. Note that regardless of any constraints, the autoregressive order
is always p
for all regimes.
Ignore or set to NULL
if applying linear constraints is not desired.
DEPRECATED, USE is_stationary
INSTEAD!
This function falsely returns FALSE
for stationary models when the parameter is extremely close
to the boundary of the stationarity region.
Kalliovirta L., Meitz M. and Saikkonen P. 2015. Gaussian Mixture Autoregressive model for univariate time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 36(2), 247-266.
Meitz M., Preve D., Saikkonen P. 2023. A mixture autoregressive model based on Student's t-distribution. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 52(2), 499-515.
Virolainen S. 2022. A mixture autoregressive model based on Gaussian and Student's t-distributions. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 26(4) 559-580.