diversity(x, index = "shannon", MARGIN = 1, base = exp(1))
rarefy(x, sample, se = FALSE, MARGIN = 1)
renyi(x, scales=c(0,0.25,0.5,1,2,4,8,16,32,64,Inf), hill = FALSE)
fisher.alpha(x, MARGIN = 1, se = FALSE, ...)
specnumber(x, MARGIN = 1)shannon, simpson or
invsimpson.base used in shannon.nlmse = TRUE, function rarefy returns a 2-row matrix
with rarefied richness (S) and its standard error
(se). Function renyi returns a data frame of selected
indices.
With option se = TRUE, function fisher.alpha returns a
data frame with items for $\alpha$ (alpha), its approximate
standard errors (se), residual degrees of freedom
(df.residual), and the code returned by
nlm on the success of estimation. Both variants of Simpson's index are based on $D = \sum p_i^2$. Choice simpson returns $1-D$ and
invsimpson returns $1/D$.
Shannon and Simpson indices are both special cases of rarefy gives the expected species richness in random
subsamples of size sample from the community. The size of
sample should be smaller than total community size, but the
function will silently work for larger sample as well and
return non-rarefied species richness (and standard error = 0).
Rarefaction can be performed only with genuine counts of individuals.
The function rarefy is based on Hurlbert's (1971) formulation,
and the standard errors on Heck et al. (1975).
Function fisher.alpha estimates the $\alpha$ parameter of
Fisher's logarithmic series (see fisherfit).
The estimation is possible only for genuine
counts of individuals. The function can optionally return standard
errors of $\alpha$. These should be regarded only as rough
indicators of the accuracy: the confidence limits of $\alpha$ are
strongly
non-symmetric and standard errors cannot be used in Normal inference.
Function specnumber finds the number of species. With
MARGIN = 2, it finds frequencies of species. The function is
extremely simple, and shortcuts are easy in plain R.
Better stories can be told about Simpson's index than about
Shannon's index, and still more grander narratives about
rarefaction (Hurlbert 1971). However, these indices are all very
closely related (Hill 1973), and there is no reason to despise one more than
others (but if you are a graduate student, don't drag me in, but obey
your Professor's orders). In particular, exponent of the Shannon
index is linearly related to inverse Simpson (Hill 1973) although the
former may be more sensitive to rare species. Moreover, inverse
Simpson is asymptotically equal to rarefied species richness in sample
of two individuals, and Fisher's $\alpha$ is very similar to
inverse Simpson.
Heck, K.L., van Belle, G. & Simberloff, D. (1975). Explicit
calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the
determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 56,
1459--1461.
Hill, M.O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its
consequences. Ecology 54, 427--473.
Hurlbert, S.H. (1971). The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique
and alternative parameters. Ecological Monographs 54, 187--211.
data(BCI)
H <- diversity(BCI)
simp <- diversity(BCI, "simpson")
invsimp <- diversity(BCI, "inv")
r.2 <- rarefy(BCI, 2)
alpha <- fisher.alpha(BCI)
pairs(cbind(H, simp, invsimp, r.2, alpha), pch="+", col="blue")
## Species richness (S) and Pielou's evenness (J):
S <- specnumber(BCI) ## rowSums(BCI > 0) does the same...
J <- H/log(S)Run the code above in your browser using DataLab